Search for: "Homes v. United States Postal Service"
Results 101 - 120
of 122
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re… [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:51 am
In the United States, about 1.5 million preventable adverse drug events occur every year. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm
It can remind us to be better people, to engage in public service and to help others who are not as fortunate. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 6:04 am
" On appeal, Brown argues that, because he sent the copy of the summons and complaint to ATIC, therefore ATIC must have received it because letters sent through the United States Postal Service are "generally" not destroyed. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Haverhill, MA; Matthew Postal, President) Bay State Flag Football League Inc. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 8:44 am
Postal Service. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 11:30 pm
Postal Service. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:10 pm
Postal Service (which employed one of the plaintiffs), Social Security Administrator Michael J. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
Catskill Mountain Mechanical Corp. and its alter ego, Plant Maintenance Services, Inc. (3-CA-26213; 352 NLRB No. 101) West Coxsackie, NY June 30, 2008. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
This was summarised during questions to the Home Office minister in the House of Lords in 2003:Lord Lester of Herne Hill asked her Majesty's Government: Whether denying prisoners the right to vote affects their ability to persuade Ministers of the Crown and those responsible for the Prison Service to improve the conditions in which they are imprisoned; and whether denying prisoners the right to vote amounts to an additional punishment; and whether this is compatible with… [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Tipton Eastern District of Kentucky at London 08a0400n.06 2008/07/02 United States Surety Company v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Tipton Eastern District of Kentucky at London 08a0400n.06 2008/07/02 United States Surety Company v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 4:25 am
According to his drivers license and the United States Postal Service, that address is the home address of the Defendant. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 9:18 am
The Board also affirmed the judge's finding that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) by declaring impasse over a change in the scope of the bargaining unit. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 12:03 pm
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held, in United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 11:29 pm
Benn was co-counsel for Johnson v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 1:32 am
Postal Service [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 11:40 am
United States Postal Service (unreported, 2005 FC 1630) decision which addressed the “public authority” issue. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 3:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
[16] Moreover, unlike the theory prevalent in the United States today, the Romans were not concerned with writing down laws for the masses to read for themselves. [read post]
