Search for: "Hook v. Hook" Results 1 - 20 of 2,689
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2016, 7:09 am by John McFarland
In January of last year the Texas Supreme Court decided Hooks v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 2:35 pm by Joseph Stacey
Watchstanders at Coast Guard Sector North Bend received a call at about 9:55am on Monday, October 22nd from the 334-foot F/V ARCTIC STORM. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 7:10 am by John McFarland
  But one Justice on the court made clear that he was joining the majority only because he was bound to do so by the Supreme Court’s opinion in BP v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 3:56 am by tortsprof
Heidi Li Feldman has posted to SSRN Why the Latest Ruling in the Sandy Hook Shooting Litigation Matters. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:47 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
The post Case Preview: Hook v British Airways and Stott v Thomas Cook appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 9:42 pm by Injury at Sea
The man reportedly suffering blunt force trauma to the face from a loose crane hook. [read post]
It’s known as Subchapter V, and it allows business owners to restructure their business without any say from creditors like the Sandy Hook families. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 6:55 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued an opinion in Van Hook v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 12:35 am by Walter Olson
“Litigation funders will be liable for indemnity costs where these are awarded against their funded client, even if the funder itself has been guilty of ‘no discreditable conduct’, the Court of Appeal ruled today in Excalibur Ventures v Texas Keystone and others [2016] EWCA Civ 1144. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 6:12 am by First Mondays
The post OT2018 #6: “Hook ‘Em, Tom” appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 10:37 am
A Nova Scotia lawyer is on the hook for $28,000 owed to a former client after the province’s court of appeal overturned a lower court ruling that found paid accounts were not subject to assessment.In a 3-0 decision in Mor-Town Developments Ltd. v. [read post]