Search for: "Hopwood v. Hopwood"
Results 21 - 40
of 58
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
A function check by Officer Hopwood showed the gun was operable. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 8:50 am
At the Cockle Bur, Shon Hopwood also covers the argument in American Electric. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 2:59 am
[Jay Schweikart on Cato amicus in case of U.S. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 6:33 am
Supreme Court in Fisher v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:35 am
A post at ACSblog suggests that Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 6:21 am
On Monday the Court denied cert. in Martinez v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Shon Hopwood. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:51 pm
" Sixteen years ago, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals forbade any consideration of race in admissions to the University of Texas in Hopwood v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm
Bennett, and McComish v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:37 am
” Briefly: For this blog, Shon Hopwood analyzes the Court’s recent opinion in Kurns v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:56 pm
(Id. at 2 [citing Hopwood v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 7:51 am
At the CockleBur, Shon Hopwood explains why, in his view, American Electric Power Company v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:08 pm
But the broader point is that this all led me to be curious as to whether UT Law School has given preferences in admissions to Native Americans, a fact I figured I could discover by rereading the Fifth Circuit’s opinion in Hopwood v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:36 pm
When UT-Austin was temporarily barred from using race by a 1996 Fifth Circuit ruling in the case of Hopwood v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 6:53 pm
A different finding emerged in 1996 in Hopwood v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 6:30 am
John Elwood at the Volokh Conspiracy discusses Thaler v. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 7:17 pm
In Young v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 9:12 pm
O.L.C. __, at *6 (citing Whitman v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 7:18 am
Rust v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 11:14 am
I will plead ignorance here of precedents under this Act; however, Kamps doesn't cite any cases under the Act, but cites instead cases such as Hopwood (which is no longer good law), Brown v. [read post]
