Search for: "Horns v. Brown" Results 41 - 60 of 80
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2019, 7:48 am by Sarah Grant
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am by John Elwood
Brown, 14-10186 (a Jewish prisoner denied permission to meet and pray with others because prison officials believed there were an insufficient number of people for organized prayer under their understanding of Judaism); Ben-Levi is joined by two-time relists Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 1:10 pm by Ilya Somin
Just as the Takings Clause "protects 'private property' without any distinction between different types," Horne v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:22 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Civil rights law in the US is completely dead unless you’re not brown or poor. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am by John Ehrett
Yee 15-169Issue: (1) Whether the Ninth Circuit’s judgment in this case should be granted, vacated, and remanded in light of Horne v. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 4:15 pm by Bill Marler
Napolitano, 628 F.Supp.2d 535,540 (S.D.N.Y 2009) (concluding the same and noting “DHS conceded this point at oral argument”); but see Brown v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 2:05 pm by Bill Marler
Napolitano, 628 F.Supp.2d 535,540 (S.D.N.Y 2009) (concluding the same and noting “DHS conceded this point at oral argument”); but see Brown v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am by John Elwood
Brown, 14-10186, claims that prison officials were religiously unkind to him in an unlawful manner, denying him the ability to meet and worship with other inmates because he could not muster a minyan of ten men prison officials claim is required for group worship. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Brief in opposition (OXY USA Inc., and Union Oil Company of California) Petitioner’s reply Brief amici curiae of Washington Legal Foundation (in support of petitioner) __________________ Docket: 08-289; 08-294 Title: Horne v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:29 am
Labeling was also granted judicial notice in: Horne v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 1:51 pm by WSLL
The Court observed that the town had not in writing or by practice designated its town treasurer to be the official on whom governmental claims must be served.As to the final issue, pursuant to its recent ruling in Brown v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by John C. Coffee, Jr.
The Court’s majority took this offered language like a bull by the horns and found the Major Questions doctrine applicable, rejecting the government’s claim that the case was not justiciable. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:12 pm by Kevin
Frankfurter served from 1939 until 1962, and is generally known as an advocate of judicial restraint although he was also a key figure in Brown v. [read post]