Search for: "House v. Garrison" Results 61 - 80 of 92
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2009, 6:29 am
The Jeffersonians had the White House, the Jeffersonians had the legislature. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:59 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
" http://j.mp/oGmZPW the new york times magazine profiles senator john kerry: "The All-American" http://j.mp/qxGVGl some more analysis of brown v ema: "Now You Are Playing with Art" http://j.mp/qr4INz can a monkey license its copyright? [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:01 am
Posted by Vishal Gupta, Sandra Mortal, and Xiaohu Guo (University of Alabama), on Saturday, April 21, 2018 Tags: Compensation ratios, Diversity, Executive Compensation, Management Corporate Governance Deviance Posted by Ruth V. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 2:56 am
Alcott, a partner at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, stressed that the federal court decision in Lopez Torres v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 6:27 am
Loseman, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Saturday, July 30, 2016 Tags: Class actions, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fraud-on-the-Market, Halliburton, Merger litigation,Omnicare v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 5:57 am
House of Representatives, Committee on Financial Services, Subcommittee on Investor Protection, Entrepreneurship and Capital Markets Posted by James Andrus, California Public Employees’ Retirement System, on Monday, July 15, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, CalPERS, Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Comm. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am by Eugene Volokh
The Washington Supreme Court, in a case examining the similarly-worded telephone-harassment statute, has defined “intimidate” to include “compel[ling] to action or inaction (as by threats),” Seattle v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
On the defense side, you ask whether the plaintiff acted as if his house was on fire—but is that taking the fire department away from other burning houses? [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 5:07 am by David Kris
 Microsoft’s Chief Legal Officer, Brad Smith, testified in Congress in February, asking the House Judiciary Committee to “[i]magine the kind of meeting that I have had to have with a Brazilian employee [of Microsoft] who is being prosecuted [for refusing to comply with Brazilian law]. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:21 pm by Big Tent Democrat
When discussing the Bush Administration's claim of unfettered Presidential power as Commander in Chief, "liberals" would cite the various opinions in Youngstown v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 4:40 am by Phil Dixon
Officer was entitled to qualified immunity on First Amendment claim relating to livestreaming of a traffic stop, but claim for Town’s policy against livestreaming may proceed Sharpe v. [read post]