Search for: "House v. Jackson et al" Results 61 - 80 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2009, 1:43 pm by WIMS
Supreme Court which decided the historic case about global warming (Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(IP finance) Patent perishables – The effects on a company’s patent portfolio when it goes bust (IPEG)   Canada Supreme Court rejects application to appeal procedural ruling in copyright case over photos showing marijuana plants growing in the plaintiff’s residence: Agnieska Wojtanowska, et al v Daniel Mustard, et al (Excess Copyright) Federal Court sets high standard of evidentiary detail, reaffirms local… [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm by Kiera Flynn
Amicus brief of Mothers Against Drunk Driving Amicus brief of Louisiana et al. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:06 am
Banc of America Investment Services, Inc. et al.NJNEWSTeaneck establishing employment discrimination committee? [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm by John Elwood
§ 1011 et seq., with regard to plaintiffs bringing tort claims for exposure to radioactivity. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 10:40 am by David Post
[A recently-filed cert petition gives the Court a good opportunity to rule on the constitutional role of presidential electors] A cert petition (available here) has been filed with the Supreme Court in the latest case involving "faithless electors," Chiafalo et al. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 5:58 am by pscamp01
Bogle et al. pay thrity -five per cent ad valorem on “sauce. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
Jan. 14, 2009)Affirming dismissal of Black fem welder's sex- and race-based harassment and retaliatory discharge claims7th Circuit* Jackson v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]