Search for: "House v. Long"
Results 1 - 20
of 11,557
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2008, 1:56 pm
More on House v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 2:39 pm
MEDIA ADVISORY: City of Long Branch v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 2:09 am
Regina (Aweys and Others) v Birmingham City Council; Moran v Manchester City Council House of Lords “A local housing authority had been entitled to decide that overcrowded families were homeless but to leave them there in the short term; it was a question of fact what term was too long. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:41 am
The Supreme Court delivered its decision in Cuomo v. the Clearing House Association today. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:37 am
This decision is the long awaited sequel to Manchester CC v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45, [2010] 3 WLR 1441 (case comment here) where a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court held (in the context of demoted tenancies under the Housing Act 1996, Pt V, Ch 1A) that where a local authority bring possession proceedings relying [...] [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 5:09 am
With the Fair Housing Act currently before the Supreme Court in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 7:38 am
in Prose Wks. (1890) V. 173 Mr. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 7:52 pm
DeLuca and City of Long Branch v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 1:13 pm
The post Discretionary Housing Payments and long term awards by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 7:16 am
White, Bank of America v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 1:46 am
Chartbrook Ltd and Another v Persimmon Homes Ltd and Another House of Lords “There were no grounds for the House of Lords to depart from the long standing rule that excluded evidence of what was said or done during the course of negotiating a contract for the purpose of drawing inferences about what the contract meant. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 9:11 am
Zillow The post Section 230 Protects Zillow for Bogus Submissions of House Details–924 Bel Air v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 6:19 am
The Clearing House Ass’n. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 11:36 am
R (S) v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 1:41 am
There was no rule of construction and no rule of law which stated that a reinsurer must respond to every valid claim under the insurance irrespective of the terms of the reinsurance.The most important aspect to the decision was the way in which the Lords distinguished the present case from the decision of the House of Lords in Vesta v Butcher [1989] AC 852. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 3:32 pm
The DA, however, recognized that the City was updating its affordable housing in lieu fee and the developer agreed to pay the updated fee so long as the updated fee was "reasonably justified. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:22 am
The developers wanted to building a housing complex called Village Green in Islip, Long Island. [read post]
28 May 2008, 1:12 am
Corby Group Litigation v Corby Borough Council Court of Appeal “The House of Lords had neither expressly nor impliedly reversed the long-standing principle that damages for personal injury could be claimed in the tort of public nuisance. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 9:17 am
By Daniel RichardsonBennington Housing Authority v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 4:45 am
After a very long gestation, the Minnesota Supreme Court has finally issued its decision in Kidwell v. [read post]
