Search for: "House v. Mullen"
Results 21 - 40
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Pinnock v Manchester City Council [2010] UKSC 45 (Supreme Court pdf & BAILII links) Whenever a battle weary group of housing lawyers gets together, conversation inevitably turns (after the routine complaints about the less congenial DJs) to the thorny issue of which is the most important housing law case of all. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Pinnock v Manchester City Council [2010] UKSC 45 (Supreme Court pdf & BAILII links) Whenever a battle weary group of housing lawyers gets together, conversation inevitably turns (after the routine complaints about the less congenial DJs) to the thorny issue of which is the most important housing law case of all. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:52 am
The leading case on the issue is the House of Lords judgment in the 2004 case of R v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 10:00 pm
Surprisingly this nettle has only really been grasped once before, by the House of Lords seven years ago in R (Mullen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, where the question whether the abuse of process in getting the defendant deported from Zimbabwe to trial in the UK rendered his conviction so unsafe as to qualify him for compensation for miscarriage of justice. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
They each raise the relevance and extent of gateway (b) in two different factual scenarios: (1) termination of a non-secure tenancy/licence occupied by virtue of section 193, Housing Act 1996 (Powell v Hounslow LBC; Manchester CC v Mushin); and (2) tenancies terminated under the introductory tenancy regime contained in Part V, Housing Act 1996 (Hall v Leeds CC; Frisby v Birmingham CC; Mullen v Salford CC). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
They each raise the relevance and extent of gateway (b) in two different factual scenarios: (1) termination of a non-secure tenancy/licence occupied by virtue of section 193, Housing Act 1996 (Powell v Hounslow LBC; Manchester CC v Mushin); and (2) tenancies terminated under the introductory tenancy regime contained in Part V, Housing Act 1996 (Hall v Leeds CC; Frisby v Birmingham CC; Mullen v Salford CC). [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 12:11 pm
Mullen are here and here.) [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 4:39 pm
Williams Mullen (aka the “cucumber incident”), or maybe Braude v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 9:50 am
Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:52 am
§§ 4651–4660–A (2010), against the landlord of that building, see Blackhouse v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Bell v. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 5:34 am
Rani Mullen in Foreign Affairs. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:01 am
Mullen, 2018. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 5:00 am
In the U.K., rendition has been unlawful since at least 2000 (R v Mullen). [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
App. 1995) (paint and varnish); Mullen v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:06 am
McCortney of Sheppard, Mullen, Richter & Hampton. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:23 pm
Reyna, a partner with Williams Mullen, specializes in matters related to international trade. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
The two women decided to begin a family together, and, toward that end, they jointly bought a house and began the process of identifying a sperm donor for use in artificially inseminating Melissa. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:25 pm
.: The House Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing titled, "The Impeachment Inquiry Into President Donald J. [read post]
