Search for: "Housing Authority v. City of Oakland"
Results 1 - 20
of 54
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 6:28 pm
(Blackkango | Dreamstime.com) Today, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in City of Grants Pass v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 1:42 am
Another significant legal battle involving murals and VARA unfolded in the case of Kerson v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
The authorities said he told investigators he intended to take hostage Pelosi, long a subject of virulent attacks by right-wing leaders and pundits. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 11:11 am
Discovery Builders, Inc. v City of Oakland, 2023 WL 4115074 (CA App. 6/22/2023). [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling that struck down Roe v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:16 am
Tiburon Open Space Committee v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The court first held that applying SB 35 to the project would not violate the “home rule” doctrine regarding charter cities, reasoning that the Legislature may infringe on the City’s authority when it sufficiently articulates a statewide interest, such as was done in the adoption of SB 35 to “address[] the crisis level statewide lack of affordable housing by eliminating local discretion to deny approval where specified objective planning… [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 10:04 am
This is plainly true of legislative assemblies, court houses, and polling places. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 10:04 am
This is plainly true of legislative assemblies, court houses, and polling places. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
The court first held that applying SB 35 to the project would not violate the “home rule” doctrine regarding charter cities, reasoning that the Legislature may infringe on the City’s authority when it sufficiently articulates a statewide interest, such as was done in the adoption of SB 35 to “address[] the crisis level statewide lack of affordable housing by eliminating local discretion to deny approval where specified objective planning… [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
The court first held that applying SB 35 to the project would not violate the “home rule” doctrine regarding charter cities, reasoning that the Legislature may infringe on the City’s authority when it sufficiently articulates a statewide interest, such as was done in the adoption of SB 35 to “address[] the crisis level statewide lack of affordable housing by eliminating local discretion to deny approval where specified objective planning… [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
“Not since Bush v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
31 Oct 2020, 9:07 am
People v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 1:00 pm
There is the shocking mashup of a video showing an Australian TV cameraman being roughed up by uniformed lawmen in Lafayette Square on June 1 as authorities cleared away demonstrators near the White House; that video has been spliced into the Australian coverage, which shows a panicked scene of the reporter, microphone in hand, describing the scene. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 10:56 am
(Citing, e.g., Rich v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 3:45 pm
The case is Save Lafayette Trees v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 4:37 pm
(Neighbors for Smart Nail v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 5:25 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, addressed states’ authority to regulate LGBT issues; his opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
