Search for: "Housing Authority v. Lopez" Results 21 - 40 of 139
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2012, 2:08 pm by Donna Coker
  The bill provides additional protection against sexual abuse and exploitation for prisoners and probationers by prohibiting someone with criminal justice authority from engaging in sexual activity with a person under his or her authority. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 8:21 pm
Carter, 160 S.W.3d 526, 533-34 (Tenn. 2005) (prior to obtaining search warrant for house where methamphetamine was allegedly being made, officer walked [*16] past defendant's house and smelled burning chemicals and heard persons running around inside); State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 4:52 am by David Bernstein
(6) Will the Republican House and the expanded Republican minority in the Senate show in any way that they take federalism and limited national government seriously, the way the Contract with America undoubtedly made Lopez more viable, and the Big Government conservatism of the Bush Administration helped lead to Raich? [read post]
15 May 2009, 2:53 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
Sunland Housing Group, Inc., supra, 18 Cal.4th at p. 257; Privette, supra, 5 Cal.4th at p. 692.) [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am by JB
Here are the questions I've put together for teaching The Health Care Cases, NFIB v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 8:34 am by Bridget Crawford
  The bill provides additional protection against sexual abuse and exploitation for prisoners and probationers by prohibiting someone with criminal justice authority from engaging in sexual activity with a person under his or her authority. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:21 am by Stephen Presser
Lopez (1995), in which Congress sought to impose federal penalties for carrying guns into or near schools, and United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
Policing such behavior, the court concludes, is a matter for the states, because it isn't authorized as a regulation of commerce or as necessary and proper to comply with treaties.The decision, handed down today, is U.S. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
Policing such behavior, the court concludes, is a matter for the states, because it isn't authorized as a regulation of commerce or as necessary and proper to comply with treaties.The decision, handed down today, is U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm by Mandelman
  For example, in the case of In re: Lopez, No. 09-10346, 2011 WL 576820 (Bankr. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 7:23 am by Simon Lester
Less than half the Democrats in the House supported the original NAFTA, and only about 30 of them supported the Trade Promotion Authority legislation given to President Obama in June 2015, which was necessary to completion of the TPP (which President Trump repudiated a few days after taking office in January 2017) as well as to the USMCA. [read post]