Search for: "Howard Bashman"
Results 261 - 280
of 803
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2007, 12:15 pm
That is the heading of this entry today in Howard Bashman's blog, How Appealing, which quotes from the Texas court's opinion, including "the step-grandfather is neither a biological nor an adoptive grandparent. [read post]
7 May 2007, 4:53 am
Howard Bashman has good essay up on citing authority on appeal. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 12:30 pm
All this was explained by Howard Bashman in a How Appealing entry yesterday. [read post]
30 May 2007, 1:26 pm
As Howard Bashman details here, today was full of interesting rulings from the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 3:21 pm
Today Howard Bashman of How Appealing notes two Florida district court opinions and an AP story that begins: Federal appeals judges say zoning restrictions by Islamorada, Fla., to block chains such as Starbuck's and Walgreen's run counter to laws protecting interstate commerce. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:59 pm
In addition to lots of new posts of note at Capital Defense Weekly and StandDown Texas Project, Howard Bashman got a chance here, just before heading out on a deserved vacation, to report on this Fifth Circuit ruling that denies habeas relief to Texas death row inmate complaining that jurors improperly considered passages from the Bible during the sentencing phase of their deliberations. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 5:11 am
Howard Bashman has been covering very well (see here and here) all the coverage of the PBS mini-series "The Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 5:29 pm
Lyle Denniston has this post at SCOTUSblog, entitled "Uncertainty on Texas death penalty cases," which follows up on Howard Bashman's post here about the interplay of the Fifth Circuit and the Supreme Court in a set of capital cases. [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 9:18 am
I just blogged about an incident where the 2nd Circuit sought to have Howard Bashman remove an unredacted judicial decision from his site and replace it with a redacted version. [read post]
3 Aug 2006, 12:15 pm
Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they speak to top blawggers, Attorney Denise Howell, whose blawg is Bag and Baggage, Attorney Ernie Svenson, who writes “Ernie the Attorney” and Attorney Howard Bashman, whose blawg is entitled “How Appealing. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 2:57 pm
As Howard Bashman has very ably chronicled at How Appealing, the proposal to limit the word count in federal court appears to be progressing via a compromise that would reduce the word count from 14K to 13K. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 6:12 pm
As Stiegler's post notes, among the presenters is "some guy named Howard Bashman. [read post]
3 Aug 2006, 12:15 pm
Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi as they speak to top blawggers, Attorney Denise Howell, whose blawg is Bag and Baggage, Attorney Ernie Svenson, who writes "Ernie the Attorney" and Attorney Howard Bashman, whose blawg is entitled "How Appealing. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 6:06 am
As he does so well, Howard Bashman has collected here some of the major media coverage of the US Sentencing Commission's decision to make its new crack guidelines retroactive. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 9:30 am
A hat tip to Howard Bashman at How Appealing. [read post]
28 May 2007, 6:48 am
(Thanks to the indefatigable Howard Bashman of the How Appealing blog for all the links.) [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 9:32 am
But Howard Bashman's most recent two posts, both which hit on sentencing topics I likely cannot give their due, reminds me of how essentially he remains to my ability to keep up with the sentencing news of note. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 9:16 am
This ILB entry from Jan. 6th noted Howard Bashman's column headlined "It's Time to Abolish 'Invisible' State Appellate Court Rulings" and then pointed out that Indiana had taken that step forward last August. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 6:16 pm
See Howard Bashman's entry in How Appeals for links to the opinion and early press coverage. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 2:41 pm
As well reported by Howard Bashman here, Judge Sim Lake sentenced Jeff Skilling at the low end of the (now advisory) 2000-era Guidelines range by imposing a sentence of 292 months of imprisonment (That's 24 years and 4 months for those not good at dividing quickly by 12.) [read post]
