Search for: "Howard Wasserman"
Results 21 - 40
of 602
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2022, 4:10 am
Project, (February 7, 2022).Robert Kahn, Face Veil Bans and “Living Together” – What’s Privacy Got to Do with It, (6 Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review 7 (2021).Sherif Girgis, Misreading and Transforming Casey for Dobbs, (Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy, Vol. 20, 2022).David Gans, Reproductive Originalism: Why the Fourteenth Amendment’s Original Meaning Protects the Right to Abortion, (SMU Law Review Forum (2022… [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:18 am
In private correspondence, another Florida-based law professor, Howard Wasserman (located hundreds of miles away from Gainesville in South Florida), asked a particularly interesting question about the total number of electors who would be eligible to vote after any successful objections. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 6:00 am
“Rocky” Rhodes & Howard M. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 4:10 am
(Rocky) Rhodes & Howard Wasserman, Solving the Procedural Puzzles of Texas’ Fetal-Heartbeat Law and its Imitators: The Potential for Defensive Litigation, (SMU Law Review, (forthcoming 2022)).Howard Wasserman & Charles W. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 8:47 am
Howard Wasserman and I wrote about this litigation in our article, The Process of Marriage Equality. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 7:40 pm
My colleagues Howard Wasserman and Rocky Rhodes predict that Braid will file a Section 1983 suit against Stilley. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 2:42 pm
Our fourth post explained that providers and advocates will have to raise their constitutional challenges to SB8 in a defensive posture in state court after being sued by a claimant for violating SB8, with our fifth post arguing that state courts should dismiss SB8 claims on state constitutional standing grounds. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 6:12 am
The details are at Howard Wasserman's Prawfsblawg post here. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 8:08 am
Our fourth post explained that providers and advocates will have to raise their constitutional challenges to SB8 in a defensive posture in state court after being sued by a claimant for violating SB8. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 3:22 am
For all the drama, lawprof Howard Wasserman has been dissecting what he calls the “procedural puzzles” that confront the pre-emptive efforts to enjoin Texas’ abortion law, SB8. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 9:24 am
Our second and third posts explained the limited offensive actions available to providers and advocates. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 8:24 am
Mirow and Howard Wasserman. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 6:59 am
Our second post explained why abortion providers and reproductive-rights activists cannot bring offensive pre-enforcement actions in federal court against any state official. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 9:07 am
Our first post described the two ways a rights-holder litigates federal constitutional rights—offensively, by seeking from a federal court a declaratory judgment of invalidity and an injunction to stop enforcement of the challenged law, and defensively, by raising the constitutional invalidity of the enforced law as a defense in the enforcement proceeding. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 10:18 pm
Howard Wasserman and my colleague Rocky Rhodes explain this point well. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 9:54 am
Thanks to Eugene for inviting us to blog about Texas's fetal-heartbeat law (SB8) and our article, which will be published in American University Law Review in January. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 9:53 am
Howard M. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 12:02 pm
For a more detailed explanation of the procedural obstacles to challenging SB 8, see this excellent article by Charles "Rocky" Rhodes and Howard Wasserman. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 12:18 pm
(Rocky) Rhodes and Howard Wasserman have posted this article at SSRN. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 6:31 am
Our previous four posts in this five-part guest series, generously welcomed and introduced by Howard Wasserman, have shown that possession seems often to influence the outcome of fights over the use of resources along the Chicago lakefront. [read post]