Search for: "Howard et al. v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 140
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2015, 5:50 am by Patricia Salkin
., et al. wanted to erect an electronic sign on its property facing Rt. 480 for the advertising of both on and off premise businesses, public service announcements, and political commentary. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 5:38 am by Ben
Sirius XM Radio Inc., et al in the United States District Court, Central District of California [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
Thus, for instance, Cao, et al., Willingness to Shoot: Public Attitudes Toward Defensive Gun Use, 27 Am. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
One of the most contentious and complicated emerging issues of corporate law in the United States is the issue of attorney client privilege when it is asserted by an entity. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 1:22 pm by Florian Mueller
Case scheduled Sep 11, 2013 10:00 a.m. in United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Howard T. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 8:33 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Perhaps it was illegal download overload after years of blogging about BU grad and former online music lover Joel Tenenbaum (see "TUOL" posts 5/21/12, 9/19/11, 7/9/10, 8/3/09 & 7/28/09), but we were remiss in not reporting a decision late last month by the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Sony BMG Music Entertainment et al. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am by Allison Trzop
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Will Baude covers United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am by Allison Trzop
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Shelby County v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 6:54 am by Rachel Sachs
On Monday, the Court also heard argument in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:45 am by David Oscar Markus
  The Justice Department agreed that the Court should address this issue because of a division among lower courts on it; the case is Kaley, et al. v. [read post]