Search for: "Howard v. Criminal District Court*" Results 61 - 80 of 320
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2013, 6:21 am by Marissa Miller
Davila, and Tarrant Regional Water District v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
Abbott, holding that states and local governments may use total population to draw legislative districts, comes from Howard Mintz of The Mercury News. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 10:29 am by Kent Scheidegger
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held oral argument yesterday in Jones v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 1:12 pm by Phil Dixon
Officer Derek Richardson with the Holly Springs Police Department stopped a car driven by Howard Davis for a window tinting violation. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
They summarily reversed an appeals court grant of habeas corpus relief to a criminal defendant in Jenkins v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 10:06 am
Howard Bashman's How Appealing blog now provides a link to the Fourth Circuit opinion. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 6:51 am
Thomas, 2015 WL 164075 (U.S.District Court for the District of Connecticut 2015). [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
  The 2nd District, for reasons which aren’t entirely clear, rejects the argument… In State v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Joshua Matz
United States (whether a district court may direct that a criminal defendant’s sentence run consecutively with a yet-to-be-imposed sentence that the defendant is expected to receive for a state crime). [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 3:49 am
First up is the 8th District’s decision in State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
US, No. 06-11543 Driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI), as set forth in New Mexico's criminal statutes, is not a "violent felony" as the term is defined in the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:52 pm by Linda Friedman Ramirez
By Linda Friedman Ramirez[1]     On February 28, 2020, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decided Innovation Lab v Wolf and affirmed a preliminary injunction against the Department of Homeland Security in its controversial Migrant Protection Protocols.[2]  The injunction had been issued by the District Court for the Northern District of California on April 8, 2019. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:52 pm by Linda Friedman Ramirez
By Linda Friedman Ramirez[1]     On February 28, 2020, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decided Innovation Lab v Wolf and affirmed a preliminary injunction against the Department of Homeland Security in its controversial Migrant Protection Protocols.[2]  The injunction had been issued by the District Court for the Northern District of California on April 8, 2019. [read post]