Search for: "Howard v. Starks"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Schweber and Anderson explain that under the test established in Brandenburg v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
"[27] Howard then singled Floyd out. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Arizona – Two Groups Making New Bid to Hide Names of Donors in Political Races Arizona Capitol Times – Howard Fischer (Capitol News Services) | Published: 11/7/2023 Attorney Scott Freeman acknowledges that Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Scott McCoy rejected his bid to void Proposition 211. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am
From Wednesday's California Court of Appeal decision in Firefighters4Freedom v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
., the plausibility requirement for complaints under Iqbal v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
On Thursday, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals held a hearing on whether Rep. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am
It is hard to imagine a more stark and tangible manifestation of the original Gilded Age than the large estates built along the Long Island Sound in the region that would later become known as the Gold Coast. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
But experts say it is the president’s son-in-law, Howard Krein, who could present fresh ethical challenges for the new administration. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 6:24 am
Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:21 pm
In one recent case, Federal prosecutors issued a Civil Investigative Demand in connection with their investigation of whether a physician had violated the Anti-Kickback Statute and Stark (which, depending on the facts, may also constitute a violation of the civil False Claims Act).[10] The respondent recipient of the Civil Investigative Demand, a California-based orthopaedic surgeon, refused to comply with the government’s request, arguing that the DOJ lacked the authority to… [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
McRae and Webster v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 5:30 am
In Myers v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 8:02 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:18 am
” Last week’s decision in Luis v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
In the following guest post, John Reed Stark, President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, sorts out the issues involved in the battle between Apple and the government, in light of all the circumstances, including the February 29, 2016 opinion by Eastern District of New York Judge James Orenstein in the separate Apple iPhone unlocking case. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 10:50 am
Maatman Jr. and Howard M. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:56 am
Griffith, Deceased v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 11:36 pm
Supreme Court’s 1991 decision in Virginia Bankshares, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm
Dick Howard has said it takes about nine years for a “new” Supreme Court’s identity to emerge, and even then there are always surprises. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 9:53 am
Howard is found here.So that's 2012 for ya'. [read post]
