Search for: "Howe v. Bishop" Results 21 - 40 of 540
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2014, 11:12 am
(Reuters/Andreea Campeanu) From Bishop Macram Max Gassis v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Broadcasters have to pay for ephemeral copies: ESA didn't overrule Bishop v Stevens, CBC v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 11:47 am
  And may well be acting inconsistently, even if (perhaps) appropriately in the present case.Figuring out how religious corporations work, and how they mesh with domestic corporation laws, ain't easy.This case proves it. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:28 pm by Tom Smith
" How could Chinese Catholics feel anything but betrayed? [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 8:02 pm
You will see that at the request of the beleaguered court clerk's office, they have now mercifully shortened the caption just to "The Episcopal Church, et al., v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 6:02 pm by Howard Friedman
Catholic bishops are not licensed medical professionals and have no place dictating how doctors practice medicine, especially when it violates federal law. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 8:28 am by David Bernstein
The late Bishop Desmond Tutu was a heroic anti-apartheid activist. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 12:11 am by INFORRM
” (Rothermere v Times Newspapers Ltd[1973] 1 WLR) The trial of the “Seven Bishops” ((1688) 3 Mod.Rep. 212 pdf) is generally taught as establishing this constitutional right as part of the story of Britain’s political progress. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 11:07 pm
How could it do that, beginning in 1914 (as we have seen), and continuing down to 1988? [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
The attorneys for Bishop Lawrence's Diocese and its parishes are asking the Supreme Court to take immediate jurisdiction of the appeal, instead of waiting to see how the appellate court will rule. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:36 pm
I noted that the very first question out of the Justices' mouth was: "How can this Court decide who is the proper Bishop of San Joaquin? [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:14 pm
How, then, can Bishop vonRosenberg even come into a court in South Carolina and describe himself in the prohibited terminology? [read post]