Search for: "Howe v. Disciplinary Board"
Results 41 - 60
of 553
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2011, 11:01 am
In Benuzzi v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 12:44 pm
(Parenthetically: How cool would it be to have something like that named after you. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 8:30 am
In Barbosa v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 9:33 am
In other action, the board: Heard a report from outside counsel on the McDonald v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:55 am
Petitioner v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
Everyone agrees that the disciplinary action was motivated by conduct that the Board—in fulfilling its statutory responsibility to determine the scope of the Act's protection—has found to be protected. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm
In San Antonio, the Chief’s Advisory Action Board has the ability to interview officers before making a recommendation for disciplinary action to the chief. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 6:42 am
Moreover, it was unclear how Banner’s rule would apply to situations where information was leaked inadvertently. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 1:34 pm
It remains to be seen how different the standard of proof is, and to see how the Board’s screening panel handles complaints. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 6:41 am
., Board Certified by The Florida Bar in Health LawI am often asked about the burden of proof that must be met by the state Department of Health (DOH) in professional licensing disciplinary cases. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 9:43 am
V. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 1:05 pm
The Board affirmed, citing NLRB v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
**Other decision addressing "recusal" include the following:● A board member’s involvement in the disciplinary process does not automatically require recusal of that individual [Birch v County of Madison, 123 AD3d 1324]● Board members who reviewed the recommendations of the Hearing Officer and acted on the charges "were not so personally or extensively involved in the disciplinary process so as to compel the conclusion… [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
**Other decision addressing "recusal" include the following:● A board member’s involvement in the disciplinary process does not automatically require recusal of that individual [Birch v County of Madison, 123 AD3d 1324]● Board members who reviewed the recommendations of the Hearing Officer and acted on the charges "were not so personally or extensively involved in the disciplinary process so as to compel the conclusion… [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
The seminal case in New York State regarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 am
Really, how could it not? [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 12:11 pm
Smith v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 12:05 pm
The policy should be posted on company bulletin boards as well as disseminated to the entire workforce. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 5:25 am
USDOL/OALJ Reporter Decisions of the Administrative Review Board May 2015 Graves v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 2:03 pm
Applebaum v. [read post]
