Search for: "Howe v. Hughes"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,256
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2018, 1:00 pm
On June 4, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Hughes v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 6:42 am
At the end of this month, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Hughes v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 9:09 am
Here’s the abstract: In Hughes v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 5:14 am
Hughes, a case involving how to identify the holding of a Supreme Court decision with no majority opinion. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 10:35 am
Earlier this month, the Court granted review of Hughes v.... [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 5:30 am
” When the Court granted cert in Hughes v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
Butler (1936); and before both Hughes and Roberts voted to invalidate provisions of the Bituminous Coal Conservation Act of 1935 in Carter v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:57 pm
“The Meta Logic of Hughes v. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 12:23 pm
His references of preliminary questions to the European Court of Justice demonstrated, among other things, how effectively he could construct a set of questions in order to sharpen the minds of jurists in Luxembourg (as in Zino Davidoff v A&G) and how boldly (in Arsenal v Reed) he could resist their responses when it seemed to them that the senior European court had usurped his own judicial functions as a trial judge. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
McInnes devotes an entire chapter to Hughes’ judicial role in the notorious case of Thatcher v Thatcher. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 4:51 am
The South African sage noted how, in Wagamama, things had actually got off to a great start, what with Advocate General Jacobs' subsequent express endorsement in Puma v Sabel of Sir Hugh's finding that that the function of a trade mark is as a badge of origin, not to mention the definitive rejection in that case of Benelux notions of assessment of likelihood of association. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:46 am
Butler (1936); and before both Hughes and Roberts voted to invalidate provisions of the Bituminous Coal Conservation Act of 1935 in Carter v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 6:00 am
Hughes v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm
New from the University Press of Kansas: The First Modern Clash over Federal Power: Wilson versus Hughes in the Presidential Election of 1916 (2016), by Lewis L. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 10:23 pm
Justice Armstrong wrote a dissenting opinion.Next time on Hughes v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 10:43 pm
Costs webinar from Kings Chambers’ Matthew Smith and Paul Hughes discussing how the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Kenig v Thomson Snell and Passmore LLP [2024] EWCA Civ 15 affects the way that solicitors ought to perform retainers dealing with the administration of estates and the likelihood and course of assessment of their […] [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:12 pm
UPDATE: Donnie Deutsch ended his show by bemoaning the civil discourse, citing how Hugh called Ed Schultz names. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:53 am
The appeal in the matter of Mastercard Incorporated and others v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE has been adjusted in listing this week and will now commence from 10am tomorrow, Wednesday 13 May 2020. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
In his recent Order, without Opinion, in the case of Best v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 10:43 pm
Costs webinar from Kings Chambers’ Matthew Smith and Paul Hughes discussing how the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Kenig v Thomson Snell and Passmore LLP [2024] EWCA Civ 15 affects the way that solicitors ought to perform retainers dealing with the administration of estates and the likelihood and course of assessment of their […] The post Costs webinar on Kenig v Thomson Snell and Passmore LLP first appeared on Legal Costs Specialists - Gibbs… [read post]
