Search for: "Howe v. People" Results 61 - 80 of 34,830
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
This Article argues that the generally accepted understanding of Hawaii Housing Authority v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:24 am by Ezra Rosser
This Article argues that the generally accepted understanding of Hawaii Housing Authority v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
The law of what people are allowed to do with their drones in the vicinity of other people’s property is undeveloped and the Counterclaim raises reasonable issues in this regard. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:06 pm by Dan Flynn
The ruling by County Judge Thomas Sponaugle in Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (PDA) V. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 10:55 am by Jocelyn Bosse
" They give particular attention to patents and access and benefit sharing under the Convention on Biological Diversity to demonstrate how these laws operate to exclude Indigenous peoples' own ontologies and customary laws, and how the law:[treats] Indigenous people's knowledge as mere information that only comes to be legitimate knowledge when it is used to benefit the ends of corporations or institutions; or else by assuming that… [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 12:38 am by Frank Cranmer
However, she indicated, “It may be necessary in another case to investigate the precise ambit of the Code of Practice and the Statutory Guidance (and the Rules) and how they interact but that is not warranted here” [14]. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”Each of these three episodes highlights how underexplained the Court’s Trump v Anderson decision last month was. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:00 pm by Gary J. Simson
The Code gives the other Justices no authority to order him not to sit, but that doesn’t mean they are powerless to try to stop him from wreaking havoc on the reputation of the Court.Because of people’s already much-depleted confidence in the Court, and because of all that’s at stake for the nation in Trump v. [read post]