Search for: "Howell v. United States of America" Results 41 - 60 of 69
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2012, 11:40 pm by admin
  Each little sperm that you release has the potential to grow into a dentist, a professional athlete, or even President of the United States of America. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 4:13 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
Since the international slave trade was illegal in the United States (while enslaving blacks already in the United States remained lawful for decades thereafter), slaves bound to America were released, but because slavery was legal in Portugal and Spain, slaves “belonging” to those owners were returned to bondage. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
  Thus, in Howell, plaintiffs could not recover as past medical expenses amounts in excess of sums actually paid by or on behalf of the plaintiff. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:35 am by Anna Salvatore
” The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this morning in Nestlé USA v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 11:33 am by Katherine Pompilio
Reynolds traced the influence of the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
By 1868, the First Insurrection was deeply seared into America's historical memory. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
: (IPEG),EU CORDIS launches a new web service for joint research initiatives: (IPR Helpdesk),EC announces plan to create single, EU-wide market for online music, films, and video games: (Ars Technica)GermanyGermans shun patents, but press for patent valuation ISO: (IPKat)Hong KongCreative commons Hong Kong begins public discussion (Creativecommons.com)IndiaBlawging our way to the front pages of Business Standard: (Spicy IP),Bootleg baloney: It's music to… [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 7:58 am by Barbara Moreno
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Fisher, Louis, Reconsidering Judicial Finality: Why the Supreme Court is Not the Last Word on the Constitution (2019). [read post]