Search for: "Howes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections"
Results 1 - 20
of 526
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
What is the correct approach to assessing medical evidence in asylum claims alleging torture? [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:24 am
The correct approach is to follow the guidance which was stated to be “authoritative” in KO (Nigeria), namely the direction in the Upper Tribunal case of MK (Sierra Leone) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] INLR 563 (“MK”). [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:09 am
First, he gave guidance on the correct approach to the application of art 8 to the removal of non-settled migrants (i.e. persons without a right of residence). [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:12 am
In this post, Shabbir Bokhari, a paralegal in the Litigation & Arbitration team at CMS comments on the decision from the Supreme Court in R (AAA and Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42 which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:59 am
Secretary, Department of Corrections, 23 Fla. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:35 am
In light of this it is interesting to examine how Lord Kerr reached the opposite verdict. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:58 am
The Secretary of State disagreed. [read post]
3 May 2015, 4:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 4:26 am
Thirdly, it will be interesting to see how the court grapples with the potentially competing principles of procedural fairness and the need for finality in litigation. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:01 pm
(R(I) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] EWCA Civ 888). [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 10:23 am
It also orders the department to produce a report 90 days from submission of the review detailing how its recommendations are being implemented. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
Secretary v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
This authority has been delegated, by the president, to the secretary of defense and further delegated to the secretary of the Army. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 5:59 pm
Secretary: We write as two members of the eight-member U.S. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 7:35 am
Some caution is appropriate however because apart from AP – whose case can proceed in the UT on a correct interpretation of the law if necessary – all the other appellants failed in their appeals. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am
Not only does it seem correct as a matter of principle, but also the lack of a lawful power to detain is likely, without more, to give rise to practical difficulties. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:23 am
On 7 March 2012, the Supreme Court gave judgment in seven linked cases, now known as W (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 8. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:50 pm
MA (Somalia) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2010] UKSC 49. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 4:45 am
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts Asylum tribunal must think properly about private life Asylum seekers cannot be forced to lie about their political beliefs HJ (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am
The Court themselves said at para. 67 that they remained “unconvinced that its approach could be reconciled with the correct legal analysis, as now accepted by [counsel to the SSHD]. [read post]
