Search for: "Hubbard v. Law"
Results 81 - 100
of 246
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2010, 1:03 am
Murphy Oil USA and Connecticut v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:46 am
In Hubbard Broadcasting v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:40 pm
”); see also Hubbard v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 10:15 am
Case Name: Douglass v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 10:05 am
From Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly's (D.D.C.) opinion in Lee v. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 3:06 am
Scanlon 2007-08: Carolyn V. [read post]
2 Feb 2019, 1:36 pm
v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:00 am
He also held, in Hubbard v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
Board of Regents (1984) and NCAA v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 4:41 pm
” Hubbard County Health & Human Servs. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:16 am
There’s been a lot of talk about Ventura v. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 11:38 pm
In a blogpost about the Microsoft/Alacatel business (Who cares who the real patent winner is in the Alcatel-Lucent v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 8:51 am
Hubbard, Deputy Attorney General; Martin L. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 1:05 am
: off-topic, but an interesting take on Grainger v Nicholson. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 8:02 am
Image via WikipediaEarlier this month, according to a report by Hubbard Broadcasting's WDIO-TV Channel 10 ABC affiliate in Duluth, Minnesota, St. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 9:01 am
In State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 5:47 am
Lord Denning decided rather eloquently [in Hubbard v Vosper: see Wikipedia here. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 am
There is significant evidence of vigorous competition in the market for mutual funds, as discussed extensively by Coates & Hubbard and in the Jones amicus brief that I joined . [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm
Johns and Greenan 2017 ONSC 6799, 2017 ONSC 6799 (CanLII) Hubbard v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court's ruling, opining although "Public Officers Law §17(3)(a) provides that the State shall indemnify its employees for a judgment or settlement provided that the act or omission which was the subject of the judgment or settlement occurred while the employee was acting within the scope of his [or her] public employment or duties," that duty does not extend to cases in which "the injury or damage resulted from intentional… [read post]
