Search for: "Hubbell v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2020, 9:26 am
In 1975, the United States Supreme Court held in Weinberger v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:31 am
He is Board Certified in Personal Injury Trial Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and AV rated by Martindale-Hubbell. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:49 am
Donovan v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
The Washington Post was first to report a former aide to Hillary Clinton, Bryan Pagliano, will invoke the Fifth Amendment to avoid the subpoena seeking his testimony from several congressional committees hell-bent on derailing the former Secretary of State’s efforts to become President of the United States. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:58 pm
The Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Groff v. [read post]
7 May 2017, 5:35 am
Fuentes: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2016/05/03/researchers-medical-errors-now-third-leading-cause-of-death-in-united-states/ http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx? [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:21 pm
Gotcher is an Investigator with the United States Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) in the Dallas Regional Office. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:11 am
Strong, currently a Fellow of the Supreme Court of the United States for the 2012-13 term, is Associate Professor of Law at the University of Missouri and Senior Fellow at the award-winning Center for the Study of Dispute Resolution, having previously taught law at the University of Cambridge and the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 12:12 pm
Transgender Employment Discrimination Risks Rising In 2020, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:45 am
This seemed to have been confirmed by the decision, not long afterwards, in Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 10:11 am
IDR Process Suspended The IDR process currently is suspended following the August 3 , 2023 ruling by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Texas Medical Association v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
” If the Secretary believes Section 11(c)(1) was violated, “[the Secretary] shall bring an action in any appropriate United States district court against such person. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 6:40 pm
Assuming the Administration follows appropriate procedures to adopt the rules, most legal commentators do not expect the legal challenges opposing the mandate orders to be successful in the courts particularly after the Supreme Court refused to overturn or hear arguments for overturning a unanimous decision of a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Klassen v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:55 pm
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Case No. 6:23-cv-59-JDK (TMA IV), vacating certain portions of 45 C.F.R. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:00 pm
In T-Mobile v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:58 pm
Accordingly, Coix filed the Coix Health, LLC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 7:41 am
In Texas v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 3:25 am
In its complaint in EEOC v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 7:59 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division (EEOC v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 10:10 am
Jan. 27, 2016); Bartnett v. [read post]
