Search for: "Huck v. Huck" Results 61 - 71 of 71
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2012, 11:54 am by Bexis
Dec. 21, 2011) (adoption not yet decided); Huck v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 7:19 am by Joy Waltemath
Finding that an employee’s ability to establish pretext hinged on the admissibility of an HR manager’s alleged remark regarding the nature of the employer’s hiring process, and that neither the parties nor the lower court addressed this evidentiary question, the Eleventh Circuit vacated the district court’s grant of summary judgment on the employee’s claim that her employer selected an applicant over her solely because he was a Korean male (Kidd v Mando… [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:26 am by Joy Waltemath
The dissent, however, argued that the focus should have been on the fact that FedEx engaged in interstate commerce and not whether the employee’s particular job would have required him to do so (Samson v Federal Express Corp, March 26, 2014, Huck, P). [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 1:36 pm
In the representative case of Pfeffer v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:45 am by WSLL
Hucke, Student Intern, Prosecution Assistance Program. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  For example, I’ve long taught the fascinating case of Elkison v. [read post]