Search for: "Hufstader v Friedman & Molinsek, P.C."
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2019, 4:36 am
In order to recover damages in a legal malpractice action, a plaintiff must establish that the attorney “failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession, that this failure was the proximate cause of actual damages to plaintiff, and that the plaintiff would have succeeded on the merits of the underlying action but for the attorney’s negligence” (Hufstader v Friedman &… [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 9:39 am
Upon [his] application for summary judgment, defendant[] [was] required to present evidence in admissible form establishing that plaintiff is unable to prove at least one of these elements” (Hufstader v Friedman & Molinsek, P.C., 150 AD3d 1489, 1489-1490 [2017] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Mid-Hudson Val. [read post]
