Search for: "Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix" Results 21 - 40 of 77
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Theedom v Nourish Training Ltd ([2015] EWHC 3769 (QB) [pdf]) HHJ Moloney QC decided, on the trial of a preliminary issue, that the claimant had established serious harm to reputation” for the purposes of section 1 of the Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
1 May 2011, 12:00 am by INFORRM
The Prime Minister said last week that he was “uneasy” about the development of a privacy law by judges based on the European Convention when this should be a matter for parliament. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
In recent years there has been a new focus by media lawyers on the operation of the “statutory privacy” provisions of the Data Protection Act 1998 (“the DPA”). [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of the Matrix Chambers media and information practice group and editor of Inforrm. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
In an important privacy judgment handed down on Friday 15 May 2020 in the case of ZXC v Bloomberg LP ([2020] EWCA 611) the Court of Appeal upheld Nicklin J’s finding that the publication of an article containing confidential information obtained from a UK law enforcement agency which was investigating a businessman was a misuse of private information. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
On 17 and 18 January 2017, a seven judge Supreme Court will hear the claimant’s appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal in the case of PNM v Times Newspapers ([2014] EWCA Civ 1132). [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:55 am by INFORRM
Max Mosley has been unsuccessful in his long running campaign to compel the English press to give advance notice of threatened invasions of privacy. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 5:28 pm by INFORRM
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of Matrix Chambers and of the Inforrm Committee. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
  This was first posted on 23 February 2010 and is the first part of a three part post in which Hugh Tomlinson QC considers the future of the law of privacy. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm by INFORRM
The Prime Minister has said that he is “uneasy” about the development of a privacy law by judges based on the European Convention when this should be a matter for parliament. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a practising barrister at Matrix Chambers who specialises in human rights and freedom of expression. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 5:33 pm by INFORRM
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of the Matrix Chambers media and information practice group and editor of Inforrm. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 12:49 am by INFORRM
  This was first posted on 26 February 2010 and is the last of a three part post in which Hugh Tomlinson QC considers the future of the law of privacy in the UK. [read post]
8 May 2019, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
In Rudd v Bridle [2019] EWHC 893 (QB), Warby J tried a number of issues arising out of a data subject access request (“DSAR”) under s.7 of the Data Protection Act 1998 (“the DPA 1998”). [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 2:55 am by INFORRM
In the case of Giesbert v France ([2017] ECHR 504, 1 June 2017)(French only) the Fifth Section of the Court of Human Rights held that Court orders made against the magazine, Le Point, sanctioning the publication of criminal court documents in the high profile “Bettancourt” case did not violate Article 10 of the Convention. [read post]