Search for: "Hugh Tomlinson QC" Results 241 - 260 of 303
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2011, 10:53 pm by INFORRM
He also flagged up Inforrm committee member Hugh Tomlinson QC’s future options for a privacy law, calling it “telling” that Tomlinson didn’t even mention self-regulation. [read post]
11 May 2011, 4:27 am by Rosalind English
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related reading: What the Mosley privacy decision really means Pre-notification rejected by Strasbourg- Hugh Tomlinson QC Absence of prior notification requirement does not violate article-8 Filed under: Art. 10 | Freedom of Expression, Art. 8 | Right to Privacy/Family, Case comments, Damages, Defamation / Libel, Freedom of Information, In the news, Media [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:55 am by INFORRM
Max Mosley has been unsuccessful in his long running campaign to compel the English press to give advance notice of threatened invasions of privacy. [read post]
9 May 2011, 11:27 pm by Adam Wagner
Don’t forget you can also read Hugh Tomlinson QC’s excellent three-part post on privacy law (part 1, 2 and 3). [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:54 am by Graeme Hall
Part 3 – Options for the Future – Hugh Tomlinson QC May 4, 2011 1 Crown Office Row #lawblogs is back on Thursday 19 May – how to sign up May 3, 2011 Adam Wagner Super injunctions go supernova – The Human Rights Roundup May 3, 2011 Melina Padron Adoption, same-sex couples and religion – again May 3, 2011 Rosalind English UK would have been obliged to use torture evidence to find Bin Laden May 3, 2011 Adam Wagner Does death of Bin Laden mark end… [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:52 am by Charon QC
The Guardian reports: “Hugh Tomlinson QC weighed in on Guardian Law via the Inforrm blog with the first of two pieces on how a privacy law might work…. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:25 pm by INFORRM
Power imbalance Hugh Tomlinson QC took issue with the media’s presentation of London as the libel capital of the world. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:47 am by INFORRM
In deciding whether or not to grant the injunction the Court will first consider whether a reasonable person, in all the circumstances, would regard each item of information as “confidential” or “private”; if satisfied, the Court will then consider whether there is, in any event, some proper justification for publication of the information (for a fuller discussion see Hugh Tomlinson QC’s post ‘Part 1: Privacy Law – the way ahead? [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:14 am by INFORRM
  Neither is it surprising that he should link a privacy law and statutory regulation – as discussed in Hugh Tomlinson QC’s post on “Privacy the way ahead? [read post]
3 May 2011, 10:30 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
This is Part 3 of a three-part series which originally appeared on Inforrm’s Blog. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:31 am by INFORRM
  The speakers will be Mark Lewis, Jonathan Coad, Professor Alastair Mullis and Hugh Tomlinson QC. [read post]
2 May 2011, 12:00 am by 1 Crown Office Row
  In 1989, after two private members’ bills concerning privacy completed the House of Commons Committee stage, the Government of set up a Committee chaired by Sir David Calcutt QC (and including Mr David Eady QC and Mr Simon Jenkins) to investigate press behaviour in relation to personal privacy. [read post]
1 May 2011, 12:52 pm by Charon QC
Part 1 – Hugh Tomlinson QC “The Prime Minister has said that he is “uneasy” about the development of a privacy law by judges based on the European Convention when this should be a matter for parliament. [read post]
1 May 2011, 12:00 am by INFORRM
The Prime Minister said last week that he was “uneasy” about the development of a privacy law by judges based on the European Convention when this should be a matter for parliament. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:40 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
The Prime Minister has said that he is “uneasy” about the development of a privacy law by judges based on the European Convention when this should be a matter for parliament. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
  In 1989, after two private members’ bills concerning privacy completed the House of Commons Committee stage, the Government set up a Committee chaired by Sir David Calcutt QC (and including Mr David Eady QC and Mr Simon Jenkins) to investigate press behaviour in relation to personal privacy. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm by INFORRM
The Prime Minister has said that he is “uneasy” about the development of a privacy law by judges based on the European Convention when this should be a matter for parliament. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
  The others were represented by Hugh Tomlinson QC, David Sherborne and Sara Mansoori. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:04 am by INFORRM
The UK Secretary of State for Justice, Kenneth Clarke recently released his government’s Draft Defamation Bill. [read post]