Search for: "Hugh Tomlinson QC"
Results 261 - 280
of 303
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2011, 7:15 am
Judgment was handed down today in the privacy case of Zac Goldsmith and others v BCD ([2011] EWHC 674 (QB)). [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of Matrix Chambers and of the Inforrm Committee. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
”[6] (b) Mr Hugh Tomlinson QC: the need for appropriate remedies as well as protection of bloggers If agreement of the kind described by Mr Justice Eady could be reached concerning the applicable law, why not also agreement about applicable remedies? [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
In last week’s judgment in the case of Bou Malhab v Diffusion Métromedia CMR Inc (2011 SCC 9) the Supreme Court of Canada refused to permit a “class action” for libel by Arabic and Creole speaking Montreal taxi drivers who had been subjected to racist and abusive coments by Andre Arthur, a “shock jock” (turned MP)(pictured right) in the course of a radio broadcast. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 4:05 pm
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of Matrix Chambers and of the Inforrm Committee. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:23 am
” US Freedom of Expression and Media Law Roundup 7 July 2010 Case Law: Flood v Times Newspapers, Reynolds defence fails Case Law: Von Hannover (No.2) to the Strasbourg Grand Chamber [Updated] “Reframing Libel Costs” – Razi Mireskandari Case Law: MGN v United Kingdom: victory for Mirror Group on success fees, defeat on privacy Mosley ECHR Case – the Media Submissions “Reframing Libel – A Practitioner’s Perspective” Part 2 – Hugh… [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 9:04 am
Editors: Dan Tench, Oliver Gayner, Anna Caddick & Laura Coogan (Olswang) Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matthew Ryder & Anthony Fairclough (Matrix) Administrator: Anita Davies UKSC Blog 2. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:10 pm
In this updated series of posts from May 2010 Hugh Tomlinson QC considers the relationship between freedom of expression and freedom of information in European, international and domestic law. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 5:15 pm
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of Matrix Chambers and of the Inforrm Committee. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of Matrix Chambers and of the Inforrm Committee. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:00 am
Over the past month, the Court of Human Rights has handed down judgment in six Article 10 cases. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 4:16 pm
Over the past month, the Court of Human Rights has handed down judgment in six Article 10 cases. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 8:00 am
The UK Supreme Court Editors: Dan Tench, Oliver Gayner, Anna Caddick & Laura Coogan (Olswang) Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matthew Ryder & Anthony Fairclough (Matrix) Site Administrator: Anita Davies [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:07 am
Opening the application, Hugh Tomlinson QC for the claimant said the case was not about the private information – which the court had held should not be published – but about the right to open justice the public had a right to know why the injunction was granted but no right to know anything about the private information. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 7:06 am
“Reframing Libel – A Practitioner’s Perspective” Part 2 – Hugh Tomlinson QC 13. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 4:23 pm
It is now well established in English law that a claim for misuse of private information can be brought in relation to information which purports to be private information about the claimant, whether or not the information is true. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 9:57 am
Or by e-mail to lscott@matrixlaw.co.uk Potential applicants who wish to discuss their application may contact the Media and Information Group Coordinator, Hugh Tomlinson QC (email hughtomlinson@matrixlaw.co.uk) or Lindsay Scott. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 4:22 pm
In this feature we revisit older posts which remain of current interest. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:48 pm
It is clear from the recent case law that the courts must be vigilant when anonymity orders are sought by either party and especially vigilant when both parties agree on anonymity. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:32 pm
This is Part 2 of a paper given to the City University Forum on “Re-Framing Libel” on 4 November 2010. [read post]
