Search for: "Hugh Tomlinson QC" Results 81 - 100 of 303
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2016, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Sousa Goucha v Portugal ([2016] ECHR 284) the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights held that the dismissal of a domestic defamation action by a gay television presenter was not a breach of his Article 8 right to reputation or of the prohibition of discrimination in Article 14. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The top ten posts of the term were as follows (in descending order) Case Law: PJS v News Group Newspapers, Court of Appeal grants privacy injunction – Sara Mansoori and Aidan Wills News: Daily Mail loses Human Rights Act challenge to CFA success fees and insurance premiums Media and Information Cases before the Appellate and European Courts in 2016 How to avoid defamation – Steven Price News: EU agrees final text of General Data Protection Regulation Investigatory Powers Bill, Bulk… [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Background The claim arose out of decision made by HHJ Crowther QC during appeal proceedings at Cardiff Crown Court on 7 and 8 April 2014 and (adjourned part heard to Newport Crown Court) on 30 June and 1 July 2014. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Theedom v Nourish Training Ltd ([2015] EWHC 3769 (QB) [pdf]) HHJ Moloney QC decided, on the trial of a preliminary issue, that the claimant had established serious harm to reputation” for the purposes of section 1 of the Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Hugh Tomlinson QC Case Law: Gulati v MGN Ltd, A landmark decision on the quantum of privacy damages – Hugh Tomlinson QC and Sara Mansoori How to avoid defamation – Steven Price Defamation Act 2013: Does section 1 replace the test of the hypothetical reasonable reader by that of the twitter troll? [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am by INFORRM
  Chambers and Partners also announced its UK Bar awards 2015 [pdf] with Matrix Chambers winning the award for defamation set of the year, Hugh Tomlinson QC defamation silk of the year, and Catrin Evans defamation junior of the year. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 1:14 pm by INFORRM
 Hugh Tomlinson QC argued that the time had come to recognise an “image right” in English law. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am by INFORRM
The appeal in the Mirror Phone Hacking damages case is due to be heard by Arden, Rafferty and Kitchin LJJ in the Court of Appeal on Tuesday and Wednesday, 20 and 21 October 2015. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 4:03 am by INFORRM
 The most popular were, in descending order: Case Law: Lachaux v Independent Print, “Serious Harm” under the Defamation Act 2013 and the drawing of inferences – Hugh Tomlinson QC A judicial ‘OK’ for celebrity feet of clay – Amber Melville-Brown What if the French constitutional judges had read the Davis Judgement? [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Brett Wilson LLP v Persons Unknown ([2015] EWHC 2628 (QB))(16 September 2015) Warby J granted a permanent injunction against the unknown operators of the “Solicitors from Hell UK” website. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
On 26 August 2015, Stephens J sitting in the Queen’s Bench Division in Northern Ireland, handed down judgment in the case of McAuley v Sunday Newspapers Ltd ([2015] NIQB 74). [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Hugh Tomlinson QC Defamation Act 2013: Does section 1 replace the test of the hypothetical reasonable reader by that of the twitter troll? [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
Case Law: ETK v News Group Newspapers “Privacy Injunctions and Children” – Edward Craven Case Law: OPO v MLA, Shock and disbelief at the Court of Appeal – Dan Tench News: Tulisa “Sex Tape”, false privacy turns into true privacy The Perils of “Revenge Porn” – Alex Cochrane La Regina Nuda and Italian Privacy Law – Athalie Matthews and Giacomo Parmigiani Case Law: Růžový Panter, OS v Czech Republic: Anti-Corruption NGO… [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The claimant resisted this argument based on the decision in Dingle v Associated Newspapers ([1964] QC 371) in which it was held that, at common law, other publications to the same effect as the words complained of or relating to the same incident, are inadmissible in relation to the assessment of general damages for injury to reputation. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Niemela v Google (2015 BCSC 1024) the Supreme Court of British Columbia dismissed a claim for a worldwide interim libel injunction against Google by a Vancouver lawyer who had been subject to online abuse by someone he alleged to have been a former client and entered summary judgment for Google. [read post]