Search for: "Hugh Tomlinson QC"
Results 161 - 180
of 303
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2018, 4:03 pm
The top ten posts of the past 12 months were as follows: Case Law, India: Puttaswamy v Union of India, Supreme Court recognises a constitutional right to privacy in a landmark judgment – Hugh Tomlinson QC Top 10 Defamation Cases of 2017, a selection – Suneet Sharma Media and Law: Review of Defamation, Privacy and other Media Cases in 2016 Case Law: LJY v Persons Unknown: Celebrity blackmail victim obtains injunction restraining publication of allegation… [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 10:31 pm
– Hugh Tomlinson QC Leveson and Legality: implementation of the Report would not be Illegal – Hugh Tomlinson QC [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 10:31 pm
– Hugh Tomlinson QC Leveson and Legality: implementation of the Report would not be Illegal – Hugh Tomlinson QC [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 4:43 pm
– Brian Cathcart Case Law: Gulati v MGN Ltd, A landmark decision on the quantum of privacy damages – Hugh Tomlinson QC and Sara Mansoori Case Law: “Spiller v Joseph – the New Defence of Honest Comment” – Catherine Rhind Case Law: Iqbal v Dean Manson, harassment by letter – Edward Craven Defamation Act 2013: The public interest defence and digital communications – Jacob Rowbottom Case Law: Růžový Panter, OS v… [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 10:31 pm
– Hugh Tomlinson QC Leveson and Legality: implementation of the Report would not be Illegal – Hugh Tomlinson QC [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:54 am
Part 3 – Options for the Future – Hugh Tomlinson QC May 4, 2011 1 Crown Office Row #lawblogs is back on Thursday 19 May – how to sign up May 3, 2011 Adam Wagner Super injunctions go supernova – The Human Rights Roundup May 3, 2011 Melina Padron Adoption, same-sex couples and religion – again May 3, 2011 Rosalind English UK would have been obliged to use torture evidence to find Bin Laden May 3, 2011 Adam Wagner Does death of Bin Laden mark end… [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:52 am
The Guardian reports: “Hugh Tomlinson QC weighed in on Guardian Law via the Inforrm blog with the first of two pieces on how a privacy law might work…. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 4:45 pm
The most popular posts of the year have been (in descending order – and excluding the Home Page, and Tables of Cases): Harassment and injunctions: Cheryl Cole – Natalie Peck Case Law: ETK v News Group Newspapers “Privacy Injunctions and Children” -Edward Craven The MP and the “Super-Injunction” – rumour, myth and distortion (again) News: Hemming MP’s “super injunction victim” named as sex abuse fabricator “The cases of Vanessa… [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 1:58 am
– Alastair Brett Case Law: Flood v Times Newspapers, Supreme Court allows “Reynolds” appeal – Hugh Tomlinson QC News: Cairns v Modi, Victory for the Claimant, damages £90,000 [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 7:06 am
“Reframing Libel – A Practitioner’s Perspective” Part 2 – Hugh Tomlinson QC 13. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:45 am
Barrister Hugh Tomlinson QC, at the forefront of the privacy law debate, supported Mosley’s view: “Parliament should be intervening and bringing in a privacy law,” he told the debate, chaired by Index on Censorship editor, Jo Glanvillle. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804) that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:34 am
“As a number of recent cases have made clear, the filming of policing activity in public places is a vital method of holding police to account. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 4:16 pm
Over the past month, the Court of Human Rights has handed down judgment in six Article 10 cases. [read post]
9 May 2011, 11:27 pm
Don’t forget you can also read Hugh Tomlinson QC’s excellent three-part post on privacy law (part 1, 2 and 3). [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:16 am
Flood v the Times Hugh Tomlinson QC on the Inforrm Blog provides an analysis of the recent judgment by the Supreme Court in Flood v the Times Newspaper, which overturned the Court of Appeal judgment and found that the Times was entitled to rely on the defence of Reynolds qualified privilege in relation to the printed publication of the article about the claimant. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 5:30 pm
Some of my criticisms of the proposals put forward by Lord Hunt and by Hugh Tomlinson QC can be found here, at the end of a paper for a LexisNexis conference on Privacy, Defamation and the Media held on 28 June 2012. [read post]
11 May 2011, 4:27 am
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related reading: What the Mosley privacy decision really means Pre-notification rejected by Strasbourg- Hugh Tomlinson QC Absence of prior notification requirement does not violate article-8 Filed under: Art. 10 | Freedom of Expression, Art. 8 | Right to Privacy/Family, Case comments, Damages, Defamation / Libel, Freedom of Information, In the news, Media [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:10 am
Related reading: What the Mosley privacy decision really means Pre-notification rejected by Strasbourg- Hugh Tomlinson QC Absence of prior notification requirement does not violate article-8 This post originally appeared on the UK Human Rights Blog and is reproduced with permission and thanks [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:15 am
His counsel, Hugh Tomlinson QC, had told the judge that Ms Garsztka was last seen by friends and relatives in December 2005 before she went to Brighton for the evening, at which time there was evidence that she was not in a normal state of mind at that time. [read post]
