Search for: "Hughes (michael A.) v. U.s"
Results 41 - 60
of 123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2016, 8:27 am
I had previously responded to a series of blog posts and articles by Michael Geist on the TPP. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 9:31 pm
Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, noted conservative donors the Koch Brothers, Mayor Michael Bloomberg of New York, Monsanto CEO Hugh Grant, and finally for the lulz, Jesus himself. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 4:29 am
Supreme Court, overcoming a historic Democratic blockade by changing the rules of the U.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 4:59 am
Walker (The Ohio State University), on Friday, December 3, 2021 Tags: Institutional Investors, Proxy advisors, Proxy voting, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation Statement by Chair Gensler on Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act Posted by Gary Gensler, U.S. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 4:35 am
Russell Spivak summarized the Second Circuit’s opinion in Doe v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am
” Michael Shear and Maggie Haberman have the story for the New York Times. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 10:05 pm
Nacre AS v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:03 am
Assistant District Attorney Hugh J. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 4:31 pm
U.S. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
by Michael C. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
It is with this backdrop that a recent paper written by Michael Geist and published by the Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI), The Unintended Equustek Effect: How one case set a precedent for Canadian courts’ growing jurisdiction over internet activities, needs to be critically assessed. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
” As expected, the proposal immediately came under fire by anti-copyright activist Michael Geist.[1] In criticizing the proposal he deployed the playbook that he uses to systematically oppose initiatives to protect creators of cultural materials;[2] namely, to deny there is any problem to be addressed, contend that even if there is problem the laws don’t need changing, and to engage in scaremongering[3], in this case, by claiming the proposal is “radical” and… [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 2:26 pm
In the Hamilton County court, Judge William Hughes, agreed, throwing out the agreement. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 9:02 pm
As Michael C. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 12:45 pm
Schiller, Bruce Schneier, Michael Specter, and Daniel J. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 3:07 pm
I pointed out that the U.S. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm
U.S. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 2:54 pm
Attorneys for Appellees: Michael P. [read post]
