Search for: "Hughes v James"
Results 1 - 20
of 311
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2009, 1:17 am
Regina v Hughes (James) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “The statutory right of a single appeal to the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division was not removed when the Attorney-General referred the case to that court, since the defendant had not exercised his right to appeal. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 2:45 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0562, 2011 MT 189, JAMES HUGHES and RHEA HUGHES, Husband and Wife, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:07 am
Regina v Hughes (James) [2009] EWCA Crim 841; [2009] WLR (D) 160 “The words ‘or in subsequent proceedings’ in s 9(1) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968 did not enable a defendant to appeal against a sentence passed by the Court of Appeal on an Attorney General's reference, but his right of appeal still remained extant [...] [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 5:22 am
Clarke, Renee Dyson, Hugh J. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 7:58 am
On February 24, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the consolidated cases Hughes v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:24 am
On April 19, 2016, the Supreme Court decided Hughes v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 7:04 am
Rory Thomson, a senior associate in the Insurance and Reinsurance Group at CMS, previews the appeal pending in the case of Edwards v Hugh James Ford Simey (a firm). [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:15 pm
The James E. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:15 pm
The James E. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 8:34 pm
Michael Carroll, American University Washington College of Law, with a panel consisting of Professor Jonas Anderson, American University Washington College of Law; James Dabney, Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, Counsel for... [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm
Benson, Jones v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:38 am
James Hughes is fifty one years old. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 5:02 pm
James Chambers vs. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:08 am
Thomas Watkins instructed Hugh James Ford Simey (the “Firm”) to make a claim under the DTI Scheme. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 10:07 am
Hughes v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
See, for example, Arland v Taylor, [1955] OR 131 (CA); R v Cinous, [2002] 2 SCR 3; and R v Lavallee, [1990] 1 SCR 852. 13. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
, (50 Questions of International Law 15 (2018).James M. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 6:37 am
Gibler & Steven V. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 2:30 am
Richard Caputo of the Federal Middle District Court of Pennsylvania addressed allegations of negligence per se in the case of Hughes v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 2:47 am
On appeal from: [2018] EWCA Civ 1299 This appeal relates to a compensation scheme set up in 1999 by the Department forTrade and Industry to provide tariff-based compensation to miners employed by the British Coal Corporation who suffered from a medical condition called vibration white finger as a result of excessive exposure to vibration through the use of vibratory tools. [read post]
