Search for: "Hughes v. Design Look Inc."
Results 41 - 60
of 74
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
In Alden v Maine, 527 US 706, the Supreme Court of the United States found that State sovereign immunity is "implicit in the constitutional design. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
The court didn’t buy it. #2 — Hughes v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am
[xi] The same day, BNP Paribas announced a partnership “to design a number of real-time trade and settlement apps using … smart contracts. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
., JAMES NEESE, DAVID NEESE, JENNIFER HUGHES, MITZI RENFROE, AND IRL HOOPER, Appellants, v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 12:33 pm
Elliott v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Speaker: William F Patry (Chief Copyright Counsel, Google Inc.) [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
Look at how Rolling Stone Magazine mismanages its most prized asset: five-star reviews. 111 Salem Group, Inc. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 6:58 am
” That royalty is no pittance: In Hughes Aircraft v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:28 am
” Here are a couple of recent ones that looked interesting to us.Tort Liability and Medical InnovationThe first one is Anna B. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:03 am
Path. et al. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 9:51 am
TSDR 5470592 ABI GRAVEL GRADER TSDR 5466945 TSDR 5470347 TRANSFORMING MANUFACTURING IN AMERICA’SHEARTLAND TSDR 5470345 CLAZZIG TSDR 5464478 SHE’S SEW FANCY TSDR 5464437 JUST LOOK UP TSDR 5464424 L V N TSDR 5464329 NATIONAL REALTY GROUP TSDR 5464134 STEWARDS OF HORT TSDR 5464051 BIOSWEEP TSDR 5464010 CELEBRITY MACHINES TSDR 5463708 MAXIM’S FINEST TSDR 5463639 ITTY BITTY BEAD BUS TSDR 5463519 BAND MECHANIX TSDR 5463512 SHOES SO FRESH TSDR 5463439 DR’S HOPE… [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
He is currently working in a temporary capacity as he looks for a permanent legal position in some area of commercial transactional or intellectual property law. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm
" Supposedly, this plastic gun was designed to sneak through metal detectors. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
’” This case, in turn, was cited by the Supreme Court in the 1984 Betamax case to support the idea that “The monopoly privileges that Congress may authorize are neither unlimited nor primarily designed to provide a special private benefit. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
In the 1932 Supreme Court case Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
The Equustek decision, Google Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am
Outline of the Proposal Maryland lawmakers were looking for revenue, but the original inspiration for S.B. 2 was never about revenue; it was a proposal for the punitive federal taxation of targeted advertising as a response to perceived exploitation of customer data and invasions of privacy, especially when used nefariously to influence U.S. politics or elections. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
However, she could pursue failure-to-hire claims under federal and local law, as well as retaliation claims based on allegations she was blacklisted and denied further appearances (Hughes v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
Last week Fairplay Canada filed an application with the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), asking for a new tool to help Canadian creators to combat online theft of their content by illegal piracy websites. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
--Elements of Law 3.0: On the Relevance of a First Year Law Course Designed to Frame the Law School Curriculum). [read post]
