Search for: "Hughes v. Frank"
Results 1 - 20
of 127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am
There was also a strike out application in the case of Vince v Associated Newspapers Limited. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
” [21] Mark Tushnet took on the twice-abandoned volume on the Hughes Court. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 5:54 am
By this time the case was called Chevron v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
Finally, the Judge stressed that there is a burden of full and frank disclosure on the applicant and the Co [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm
The deal was characterised as “underhand, dubious and lacking in frankness” [13]. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Eddington (Senior Fellow, Cato Institute)“Lessons Learned and Caveats for the Future: The January 6, 2021, Attempted Insurrection”Expert Statement Mary Anne Franks (Professor of Law and Michael R. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:30 am
Cheffins and Bobby V. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:30 am
Cheffins and Bobby V. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
[On Tuesday, April 4, Georgetown Law devoted a session of its faculty workshop to honoring the publication of The Hughes Court: From Progressivism to Pluralism, 1930-1941 (Cambridge University Press, 2022), a volume in the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States, by Mark V. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:36 am
SAS Inst. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
This so-called "Glomar response" is derived from a Cold War-era case, when the CIA refused to confirm or deny to the Los Angeles Times whether it had information about the USNS Hughes Glomar Explorer, a CIA ship that was used to try to salvage a sunken Soviet spy sub. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 3:06 pm
From Montaquila v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The critics and cheerleaders of Dr. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 7:39 pm
" Frank v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:36 pm
In 2016, Leonard v. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
I offer a couple of examples, written by Chief Justice Hughes (who was no slouch as a lawyer), out of many that could be deployed.[12] Wood v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 2:50 am
Disposal of assets Impact on award In M v M (Financial Misconduct: Subpoena against Third Party) [2006], in breach of undertakings, which are solemn promises to the court, the husband failed to provide full and frank disclosure of his financial affairs and had also gambled away a significant amount of money. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
Hughes III, and Michael Dauber. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
Hughes III, and Michael Dauber. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
(citing Bowen v. [read post]