Search for: "Hughes v. Frank" Results 21 - 40 of 127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2012, 5:29 am by David Bernstein
On the other hand, Hughes wrote the majority opinion in Bailey v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 2:02 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Advocate General representing the Commissioners of HMRC v K E Entertainments Ltd (Scotland), heard 29 April 2020 Stoffel & Co v Grondona, heard 5 May 2020 Ecila Henderson (A Protected Party, by her litigation friend, The Official Solicitor) v Dorset Healthcare Trust, heard Monday 11- Tuesday 12 May 2020 Mastercard Incorporated & Ors v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE, heard Wednesday 13- Thursday 14 May 2020 AP v Her Majesty’s Advocate… [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
On 10 June 2021 there was a unilateral statement in open court in the “Sun only” claim brought by Sir Simon Hughes. [read post]
11 May 2015, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
Background The applicants in this case were two Austrian journalists, Harald Armellini and Frank Andres, and Zeitungs-und Verlags GmbH, a publishing company. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:26 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue and anor, heard 20 – 29 February 2012. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:31 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue and anor, heard 20 – 29 February 2012. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I offer a couple of examples, written by Chief Justice Hughes (who was no slouch as a lawyer), out of many that could be deployed.[12]  Wood v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:21 am by INFORRM
  It includes the intrinsic worth of human beings shared by all people as well as the individual reputation of each person built upon his or her own individual achievements” (Khumalo v Holomisa [2002] ZACC 12 [27] ) There is social value in ensuring that false statements which adversely impact on a person’s reputation are corrected. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:16 am by John H. Simpson
The decision in Vinod Chopra Films Private Limited et al. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 5:40 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Edwards on behalf of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors, heard 25 Jul 2019. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
On Friday 20 November, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation and others (Respondents) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Appellant) (1) and Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation and others (Respondents) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Appellant) (2). [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Edwards on behalf of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors, heard 25 Jul 2019. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 6 March, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Commissioners for HMRC v Frank A Smart & Sons Ltd (Scotland). [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 6:30 am by Terry Hart
Chamber’s Frank Cullen offers some celebratory remarks. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 10:00 pm by Michael
Bettinger-López, the Human Rights Clinic, and the ACLU currently represent Gonzales in Jessica Gonzales v. [read post]