Search for: "Hughes v. Frank" Results 81 - 100 of 128
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
Doyal, Chief Justice Hughes spoke as follows respecting the copyright monopoly granted by Congress, ‘The sole interest of the United States and the primary object in conferring the monopoly lie in the general benefits derived by the public from the labors of authors. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
In the 1932 Supreme Court case Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 5:39 am by Rob Robinson
Judge Finds Rambus Destroyed Evidence in Hynix Case - http://reut.rs/QdyJGF (Michael Erman) What Lawyers Must Know About Technology Assisted Review - http://bit.ly/Q1GEXx (Sandra Burch) Reports and ResourcesMobile Applications for Law Students and Lawyers – UCLA School of Law - http://bit.ly/PY6ATM (Hugh & Hazel Darling Law Library) EDD Update: Predictive Coding Vendors Duel for ‘Dummies’ - http://bit.ly/QheM1y (Michael Roach)… [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm by INFORRM
[Week commencing 13 August] Full Fact v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 17/08/2012; Joseph Horner v The Observer, Clause 1, 16/08/2012; Mr Christopher Mackin v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Jane Hughes v The Independent on Sunday, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Dr Yannis Alexandrides v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Alex Jarvis v Daily Mail, Clauses 3, 5, 15/08/2012; Inspired Thinking… [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am by familoo
Yours faithfully Solicitors David Jockelson Miles and Partners Kate Hammond Miles and partners Sarah Cove Miles and Partners Amanda Dench Miles and Partners Pauline Lloyd Ewings & Co Peggy Ray Goodman Ray Gwen Williams Goodman Ray Hilka Hollmann Goodman Ray Joanna Bosanquet  Goodman Ray Michael Bourdages Goodman Ray Christina Blacklaws  TV Edwards David Emmerson T V Edwards Lorraine Green TV Edwards Susan Fitzgerald TV Edwards Valerie Greenfield  Fisher Meredith LLP… [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 5:29 am by David Bernstein
On the other hand, Hughes wrote the majority opinion in Bailey v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 3:35 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
  The Press has published the collected works of Langston Hughes, Harry Truman and Mark Twain, for example. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
Resolved cases include: Mr Stephen Wren v Daily Mail (Clause 1), 11/05/2012; A man v The Sun (Clause 1), 11/05/2012; Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 11/05/2012; Ms Louise Pyne v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 08/05/2012. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 2:45 am
"FBI: Disinfect Your Computer Or Risk Losing Internet Access Come July" advises Adrian Kingsley-Hughes of Forbes. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:31 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue and anor, heard 20 – 29 February 2012. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:26 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue and anor, heard 20 – 29 February 2012. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:43 am
Emma QC has been involved in some of the IPKat's favourite legal disputes, including Interflora v Marks & Spencer, Matratzen Concord v Hukla and one case which, in this Kat's opinion, should never have been allowed to go to court, Reed v Reed. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:03 am by Steve Hall
Assistant District Attorney Hugh J. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm by Law Lady
Frank of the District of Minnesota rejected a virtually identical plea deal over the company's concealment of defects in some of its implantable heart defibrillators, saying it lacked a probation element.Hydro ThermAblator (Federal Preemption): 5TH CIRCUIT RESTORES PART OF BURN VICTIM'S SUIT AGAINST BOSTON SCIENTIFIC, Hughes v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:21 am by INFORRM
  It includes the intrinsic worth of human beings shared by all people as well as the individual reputation of each person built upon his or her own individual achievements” (Khumalo v Holomisa [2002] ZACC 12 [27] ) There is social value in ensuring that false statements which adversely impact on a person’s reputation are corrected. [read post]