Search for: "Hughes v. Moore"
Results 101 - 120
of 153
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
The PCC has not made any new adjudications during its transition period, but there are several resolved cases to report: Mr Philip Bovey v The Independent, Clause 12, 26/03/2012; Mr Nic Bullough v Southern Daily Echo, Clause 1, 23/03/2012; Mr Freddie Wright v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 23/03/2012; Dr John Glasspool v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 23/03/2012; The Scottish Refugee Council v Scottish Daily Mail, Clause 1, 23/03/2012; Ms Lucy Buckingham… [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:47 am
In a unanimous decision ([2012] UKSC 11) the Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Times Newspapers Limited against a decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804) which had held that it could not rely on Reynolds qualified privilege. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:22 am
In a unanimous decision ([2012] UKSC 11) the Supreme Court today allowed the appeal of Times Newspapers Limited against a decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804) which had held that held that it could not rely on Reynolds qualified privilege. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am
Dudley Moore) 22. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:24 am
Speakers included Geoffrey Robertson QC, Hugh Tomlinson QC, PA Media Lawyer editor Mike Dodd and the journalist Heather Brooke. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
Half-day seminar on legal knowledge in a digital age, with speakers including Geoffrey Robertson QC, Hugh Tomlinson QC, Heather Brooke, Mike Dodd and Adam Wagner. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am
The witness statement of Jemima Khan and second supplement witness statement of Hugh Grant were taken as read. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
Half-day seminar on legal knowledge in a digital age, with speakers including Geoffrey Robertson QC, Hugh Tomlinson QC, Heather Brooke, Mike Dodd and Adam Wagner. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
Journalism and the PCC There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but four “resolved” complaints: Information Affairs Authority of Bahrain v The Independent, Clause 1, 14 December 2011 ; Mrs Kate Adams-Moor v The People, Clause 1, 13/12/2011; Brent Council v Kilburn Times Clause 1, 2, 12/12/2011; Mr Will Knock v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/12/2011. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 10:30 am
., Brooklyn Jose Maldonado Bushwick/Hylan Houses, 140 Moore St., 1st fl., Brooklyn Kevin McBride Nostrand/Sheepshead Houses, 3044 Avenue V, 4th fl., Brooklyn Michael McNeil a/k/a Ivan McNeil Van Dyke Houses, 429 Dumont Ave., 3rd fl., Brooklyn Jesus Miranda Cypress Hills Houses, 305 Fountain Ave., 3rd fl., Brooklyn Jamaine Mitchell Adams Houses, 68 Tinton Ave., 1st fl., Bronx Don Mottley Langston Hughes Houses, 301 Sutter… [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:51 pm
MOORE v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm
Hugh Grant’s evidence perhaps provoked the biggest press reaction by suggesting that his phone had been hacked by the Mail on Sunday. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm
Hughes, Jr., Book Note, Reviewing Bill Madden, Steinbrenner: The Last Lion of Baseball, 21 MARQUETTE SPORTS LAW REVIEW 801 (2011)Michelle R. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 9:31 pm
Guy Fawkes Day is the British fireworks holiday appropriated by Alan Moore in the 1982 comic V for Vendetta, which was made into a movie in 2006, which in turn inspired the iconic mask used by the group. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:30 am
On Wednesday 2 or Thursday 3 November 2011, the Court of Appeal (Hughes, Black and Tomlinson LJJ) will hear the appeal in the case of Cambridge v Makin. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
It is said that it should have applied the approach in Galloway v Telegraph ([2006] EWCA Civ 17) and should only have overturned the judge’s decision on balancing conflicting Convention rights if it was “plainly wrong”. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
It is said that it should have applied the approach in Galloway v Telegraph ([2006] EWCA Civ 17) and should only have overturned the judge’s decision on balancing conflicting Convention rights if it was “plainly wrong”. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
It has been forcefully argued that the decision of the Court of Appeal is inconsistent with the decision of the House of Lords in Jameel v Wall Street Journal ([2007] 1 AC 359). [read post]
