Search for: "Hughes v. Public Defenders Office"
Results 1 - 20
of 207
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2017, 2:22 am
Hugh Tomlinson QC is the joint author of The Law of Human Rights, 2nd Edn, OUP, 2009, and an editor of Inforrm [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:21 pm
The claimant’s full name was mentioned in open court when a police officer said that a witness had failed to pick him out on an identification parade. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm
If, for example, a candidate for public office had a spent conviction for dishonesty then there would a plain public interest in disclosing it. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 7:29 pm
[During the pendency of this action, Hughes died, and his daughter, Hughes-Ortiz, was substituted as a party defendant.] [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm
A clear illustration is to accuse a candidate of corruption, even if that corruption involves the conduct of a public or political office. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 8:21 am
Aug. 17, 2020) Prior Posts on Section 512(f): * Another 512(f) Claim Fails–Ningbo Mizhihe v Doe * Video Excerpts Qualify as Fair Use (and Another 512(f) Claim Fails)–Hughes v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 5:16 pm
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a bar [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
Attorney's Off., 2018 NY Slip Op 00895, Appellate Division, First Department, a public officer may be entitled to claim absolute immunity as a defendant in a lawsuit under certain circumstances. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
This is only the second time that the highest court has considered the application of the “responsible publication in the public interest”, first established by the House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers ([2001] 2 AC 127) nearly 12 years ago. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 12:04 pm
Louis Sirkin (Santen & Hughes). [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 5:15 pm
The Fourthy Section case of Aquilina and Others v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
This is only the second time that the highest court has considered the application of the “responsible publication in the public interest”, first established by the House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers ([2001] 2 AC 127) nearly 12 years ago. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
This is only the second time that the highest court has considered the application of the “responsible publication in the public interest”, first established by the House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers ([2001] 2 AC 127) nearly 12 years ago. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 6:38 am
State v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am
The Home Office rejected the request, stating that it is not in the public interest to disclose any of the requested information. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:48 pm
This is a high threshold (see Re Officer L [2007] 1 WLR 2135 [20]). [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 7:30 am
When a judicial review was brought against the decision of a misconduct hearing panel, the defendant was the chief constable of that force: see R (Gannon) v Chief Constable of Merseyside [2009] EWHC 2133 (Admin) and R (Evans) v Chief Constable of Sussex [2011] EWHC 2329 (not available on Bailii or ICLR). [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:03 pm
On September 8, 2017, in X v Y & Z, the court continued and expanded an interlocutory injunction against anonymised defendants. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court decided the case of Utah v. [read post]
15 May 2021, 8:51 am
It applies when one or two questions side with the police officer asserting it: (i) did the defendant violate a constitutionally protected right? [read post]
