Search for: "Hughes v. Reed" Results 1 - 20 of 142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2008, 12:23 pm
His references of preliminary questions to the European Court of Justice demonstrated, among other things, how effectively he could construct a set of questions in order to sharpen the minds of jurists in Luxembourg (as in Zino Davidoff v A&G) and how boldly (in Arsenal v Reed) he could resist their responses when it seemed to them that the senior European court had usurped his own judicial functions as a trial judge. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 8:34 pm by Patent Docs
Michael Carroll, American University Washington College of Law, with a panel consisting of Professor Jonas Anderson, American University Washington College of Law; James Dabney, Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, Counsel for... [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 6:52 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
In November 2017, the Supreme Court (sitting in a panel comprising Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Reed, Lord Hughes and Lord Lloyd-Jones) will hear this appeal relating to the lawfulness of the disclosure of a rape acquittal on an Enhanced Criminal Records Check (‘ECRC’). [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am by Alison Macdonald, Matrix
On 12-13 November, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Kerr, Dyson, Hughes and Hodge) heard the case of Beghal v Director of Public Prosecutions, a challenge to the broad power of detention contained in Schedule 7 to the Terrorism Act 2000. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 5:00 am by Ted Folkman
Maguire of Hughes Hubbard & Reed has a new article, Current Issues in Federal Civil E-Discovery, Proportionality, International Discovery and Deposition Practice, and Changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 5:00 am by Ted Folkman
Maguire of Hughes Hubbard & Reed has a new article, Current Issues in Federal Civil E-Discovery, Proportionality, International Discovery and Deposition Practice, and Changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 2:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Richard Caputo of the Federal Middle District Court of Pennsylvania addressed allegations of negligence per se in the case of Hughes v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:47 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
Accordingly, their claims for compensation for injury to feelings could not succeed. [54] The Issues on Appeal In a hearing scheduled for November 20, 2013 the Supreme Court, constituted of Baroness Hale and Lords Neuberger, Reed, Hughes and Toulson, will have to consider whether the Montreal Convention can operate to exclude a claim for damages arising from a breach of EU law. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am by INFORRM
Given the differing traditions from which its judges are drawn, and bearing in mind that the court has not regarded the award of just satisfaction as its principal concern, it is not altogether surprising that it has generally dealt with the subject relatively briefly, and has offered little explanation of its reasons for awarding particular amounts or for declining to make an award”, per Lord Reed, Regina (Faulkner) v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] 2 AC 254 [34]. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am by Alice Grainger, Levison Meltzer Pigott
In terms of materiality, he considered the House of Lords’ decision in Livesey (formerly Jenkins) v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Edwards on behalf of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors, heard 25 Jul 2019. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 12:39 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Michael Williams, No. 109,353 (Sedgwick)Direct appeal; First-degree murderDeborah Hughes (brief); Michelle A. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 6:30 am by ANTHONY FAIRCLOUGH, MATRIX
Background The Supreme Court heard the appeal (from [2014] EWCA Crim 1197) on 3-4 May 2016 and the panel consisted of Lords Neuberger, Mance, Reed, Carnwath and Hughes. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 2:07 am by Laura Coogan, Olswang LLP
The case was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed and Lord Hughes. [read post]