Search for: "Hughes v. Sullivan" Results 21 - 40 of 55
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2017, 4:45 am by Jordan Brunner
In the Foreign Policy Essay, Jacob Stokes and Alexander Sullivan argued that China will not fix North Korea, offering four other areas of focus instead. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
  The same day the Court of Appeal (the Master of the Rolls, Sullivan and Black LJJ) will hear an application for permission to appeal in the case of Hutcheson v Popdog Ltd. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Claimants included the Duchess of York, James Blunt, Christopher Eccleston,Uri Geller and Hugh Grant, as reported by Press Gazette. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Research and Resources “Institutional Actors in New York Times v Sullivan”, Paul Horwitz, Georgia Law Review, Forthcoming. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 8:28 am by Sam Cohen, Alex Vivona
National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan held a call with Philippine National Security Adviser Hermogenes Esperon in which Sullivan “underscored that the United States stands with our Philippine allies in upholding the rules-based international maritime order, and reaffirmed the applicability of the U.S. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Section 9(2) codified the approach of the Court of Appeal in Dow Jones v Jameel [2005] EWCA Civ 75 (03 February 2005) established that there needs to be a real and substantial tort within the jurisdiction for a defamation claim to be made (see also Sullivan v Bristol Film Studios [2012] EWCA civ 570 (03 May 2012); Reed Elsevier (t/a Lexisnexis) v Bewry [2014] EWCA Civ 1411 (30 October 2014)). [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Half-day seminar on legal knowledge in a digital age, with speakers including Geoffrey Robertson QC, Hugh Tomlinson QC, Heather Brooke, Mike Dodd and Adam Wagner. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm by INFORRM
  The only one of the impressive range of speeches was that given by Hugh Grant – where he called on European Union regulators to restrict the influence of media moguls such as Rupert Murdoch. [read post]