Search for: "Hughes v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 919
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2014, 9:36 pm
§ 1498(a) The statute states:Whenever an invention described in and covered by a patent of the United States is used or manufactured by or for the United States . . . the owner’s remedy shall be by action against the United States in the United States Court of Federal Claims . . . .28 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 9:29 pm
United States and Matters of Evidence Before the International Court of Justice Fernando Lusa Bordin, The Nicaragua v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 12:34 pm by anbrandon
But that panel's opinion today in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 12:08 pm by Jason Rantanen
But, in my view, a foreign sale does result in exhaustion if an authorized seller has not explicitly reserved the United States patent rights. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am by Richard Altieri, Margaret Taylor
On June 1, President Trump spoke to governors and the public about deploying the military within the United States. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
We’re returning to the topic of implied Buckman preemption today to discuss three recent decisions, Hughes v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Hughes v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 10:40 am by Gene Quinn
The court also specifically invited the United States Department of Justice to file a brief expressing the views of the United States as amicus curiae. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 12:14 pm by Gene Quinn
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently issued a unanimous panel decision in Halo Electronics, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 2:30 pm by Chip Merlin
UP has filed amicus curiae briefs in state and federal courts around the country that push back against the insurance industry’s campaign to upend decades of carefully reasoned decisions – including California state court decisions such as Hughes v. [read post]