Search for: "Hughes v. Worth" Results 41 - 60 of 240
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2020, 1:11 pm by Kevin LaCroix
This is according to the test laid down by the Supreme Court in 2017 in Ivey v Genting Casinos. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 11:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
FAANG are worth billions, even trillions. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:25 am by Sophie Corke
Murphy, Austrian Supreme Court revisits football screening in pubs | Dutch State not liable for incorrect interpretation of private copying exception, says Hague Court of Appeal | West African Cotton Company Limited v Hozelock Exel: How may a petitioner establish lack of novelty of a registered design in Nigeria? [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 2:06 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Every year after Labor Day, I take a step back and survey the most important current trends and developments in the world of Directors’ and Officers’ liability and insurance. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
” And, at a similarly crucial point in Matal v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by John Gregory
(However, Patricia Hughes has.) [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 10:47 am by Mark Tushnet
For reasons not worth going into, I was reading the Supreme Court Review volume for 2013, and found in it a (quite good on its own terms) 100-page article on United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 2:31 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Tries to address 1A issues including US v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 1:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Indeed, kids do a lot of copying that isn’t even noticed as copying: trace the letters to learn how to write; instruction where we have students watch then do, which is to say copy, then teach, which is to say have others copy you; perhaps this can often be distinguished as processes v. outputs, but copying letters is copying outputs, not just tasks. [read post]