Search for: "Human Genome Sciences Inc. " Results 21 - 40 of 125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2009, 10:21 am
Following a one year clinical trial, Human Genome Sciences Inc. has announced positive results of lupus patients using Benlysta for more effective treatment of pain, hair loss, and skin rash in lupus patients. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 11:58 pm
In August 2008 Mr Justice Kitchin delivered a mega-judgment in Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences Inc, [2008] EWHC 1903 (Pat) on patent validity (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 1:44 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Myriad Genetics holds several patents covering genomic materials relating to the human Breast Cancer Susceptibility Genes 1 and 2. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:40 am by tracey
Supreme Court Rainy Sky SA & Orsd v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50 (2 November 2011) Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company [2011] UKSC 51 (2 November 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) MD (Angola) & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1238 (01 November 2011) Mitu v London Borough of Camden [2011] EWCA civ 1249 (01 November 2011) Williams v University of Birmingham & Anor… [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 3:51 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Eli Lilly & Company v Human Genome Sciences, Inc [2012] EWCA Civ 1185 (05 September 2012) Carey -Morgan & Anor v Sloane Stanley Estate [2012] EWCA Civ 1181 (03 September 2012) French v Carter Lemon Camerons LLP [2012] EWCA Civ 1180 (03 September 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) McClaren v News Group Newspapers Ltd. [2012] EWHC 2466 (QB) (05 September 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Perry v Nursing… [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 6:18 am by David Jensen
Stanford and Stanford faculty-founded companies such as Stem Cells Inc, are blatantly promoted over others. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:43 pm
This case concerns an appeal [2010] EWCA Civ. 33 from the August 2008 judgment in Eli Lilly & Co. v Human Genome Sciences Inc., [2008] EWHC 1903 (Pat), wherein Mr. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:43 pm
This case concerns an appeal [2010] EWCA Civ. 33 from the August 2008 judgment in Eli Lilly & Co. v Human Genome Sciences Inc., [2008] EWHC 1903 (Pat), wherein Mr. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
There are two appeals in the Supreme Court beginning with Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company to be heard on Monday 18 to Wednesday 20 July 2011 by Lords Hope, Walker, Neuberger, Collins and Clarke. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:30 am by Gene Quinn & Angel Krippner
According to Human Genome Sciences, the principle patents covering BENLYSTA will generally expire between 2016 and 2023 in the United States and between 2016 and 2021 in the rest of the world. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 3:08 am by Mark Summerfield
  In the same month, a team led by Feng Zhang at the Broad Institute, Inc and MIT reported similar success using CRISPR to edit human genes.Which brings me to the main topic of this post. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:06 pm
Lilly had challenged the validity of the patent of Human Genome Sciences, Inc., of Rockville, Maryland that covers the gene sequence of a protein called Neutrokine-?. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 10:24 am
High Court (Family Division) Z County Council v TS & Ors [2008] EWHC 1773 (Fam) (25 July 2008) SW v SW & Anor [2008] EWHC 1890 (Fam) (31 July 2008) High Court (Patents Court) Re Council Regulation (EEC) No 1768/92 [2008] EWHC 1902 (Pat) (31 July 2008) Eli Lilly & Company v Human Genome Sciences Inc [2008] EWHC 1903 (Pat) (31 July 2008) Source: www.bailii.org. [read post]