Search for: "Humane Society of the US v. US Fish and Wildlife Service"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2014, 10:24 am
Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 7:37 am
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) International Wildlife Conservation Program, consolidating the International Affairs and Wildlife Without Borders programs, and the divisions of Management Authority and Scientific Authority. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 8:05 am
Fish and Wildlife Serv., 1:21-cv-00448 (S.D.N.Y. filed Jan. 19, 2021); New York v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 8:05 am
Fish and Wildlife Serv., 1:21-cv-00448 (S.D.N.Y. filed Jan. 19, 2021); New York v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:45 am
In addition, the agencies conducted outreach to indigenous organizations, civil society, and other interested individuals. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Department’s Environmental Review The Department of Fish and Game’s (now the Department of Fish and Wildlife) (“department”) EIR at issue in the case relates to the general planning and conservation steps resulting from the County’s specific plan. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
California Department of Fish and Game and Sierra Club v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
This protest, which was entirely peaceful, also drew inspiration from a long animosity between ranchers in a number of western states and the federal government, acting through its agents, the Bureau of Land Management and the Fish and Wildlife Service. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
California Department of Fish and Game, et al. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:58 am
Biodiversity conservation v. hydropower dams: can saving the fish save the Mekong River Basin? [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 3:00 am
(Schwartz v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:29 pm
Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”). [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Preventing coal companies from using compliance schedules to loophole around th [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm
Fish and Wildlife Service issued a final environmental impact assessment for its proposed rule that would reinterpret the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 to prohibit only the intentional killing of birds. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
– Environmental Protection, February 26, 2010 United Parcel Service has agreed to pay a $53,931 civil penalty to U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
The appellate court concluded that there was substantial evidence of a fair argument of potential impacts because (1) a letter from California Department of Fish and Wildlife (“CDFW”) indicated that the studies relied upon were “outdated,” and (2) the most recent study was during a drought period, and CDFW recommended additional studies. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:24 am
Make UC a Good Neighbor v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
County of Butte v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Fish & Game Commission (1997) 16 Cal.4th 105; Health First v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Fish & Game Commission (1997) 16 Cal.4th 105; Health First v. [read post]
