Search for: "Humphrey v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 551
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2008, 2:02 am
The Court has referred in its reasoning to the ILC Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts in its Judgment on the merits in the Congo v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:12 am
After the Fifth Circuit heard oral argument in All American Check Cashing, the Fifth Circuit granted the petition for en banc review in Collins v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
Humphrey, 14-8349, two relists after arrival of the record before it won its grant. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 2:26 am
[1] (Iancu v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 11:48 am
In Walker v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 12:30 pm
Humphrey bars her retaliation claim. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:17 am
Easy Sanitary Solutions v Group Nivelles, C-361/15, on the irrelevance of the sector of use to determine novelty and individual character), but also 3d marks (cf. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 11:55 pm
Indeed, after 1975 the Court delivered a series of landmark judgments, including, for example, Golder v UK (1975), Engel v the Netherlands (1976), Tyrer v UK (1978), Marckx v Belgium (1979) and Sunday Times v UK (1979). [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am
Francisco acknowledged that the Supreme Court’s 1935 decision in Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 8:58 am
Humphrey’s article “Let’s Talk About Sex”: Legislating and Educating on the Affirmative Consent Standard is cited in the following article: Ruthy Lowenstein Lazar, Epistemic Twilight Zone of Consent, 30 S. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 5:21 am
That sturdy precedent was the Court’s decision in the case of Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
It will look back to several important recent Supreme Court decisions, in particular Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:01 am
This modest slap on the wrist is strong evidence that the current conservative Justices will not take on the constitutional status of independent agencies, which were accepted in Humphrey’s Executor v, United States (1935), even though these could be challenged on the ground that the so-called “fourth branch” of government does not fit into the tripartite constitutional structure with its legislative, executive, and judicial branches. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
State of California, Department of Motor Vehicles (2023) 88 Cal. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 10:52 am
Circuit in Bluman v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:24 am
The Tax Court found this approach sensible in Humphrey v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 3:26 am
In the decision by DKBoA the DKBoA more or less repeated the arguments put forward by the DKPTO and referred to case C-487/07, L’Oréal v. [read post]
