Search for: "Hunter v. Brown" Results 1 - 20 of 152
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2012, 4:04 pm by Lawrence Solum
Hunter (Georgetown University Law Center) has posted Animus Thick and Thin: The Broader Impact of the Ninth Circuit Decision in Perry v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 6:52 pm
Brown, 381 U.S. 437 (1965)Nixon v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:28 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) JBol Ltd, R (on the application of) v The Health Protection Agency [2012] EWCA Civ 1 (12 January 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Thomas Brown Estates Ltd v Hunters Partners Ltd [2012] EWHC 21 (QB) (12 January 2012) Fitzpatrick & Ors v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2012] EWHC 12 (QB) (11 January 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) SB Corporate Solutions Ltd v Prescott &… [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 3:20 pm by Ilyse Schuman
Hunter next discussed the Board’s recent invitation for input on whether university faculty members are employees covered under the NLRA or are managerial employees excluded from coverage, as was established by the case NLRB v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:50 pm by lennyesq
By Ruth Marcus *** In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 11:42 am
I've got "bear" in mind today, because I'm teaching District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:01 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Clinton, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2 (17 January 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Royal Bank of Scotland v Revenue And Customs [2012] EWHC 9 (Ch) (17 January 2012) Armstrong DLW GmbH v Winnington Networks Ltd [2012] EWHC 10 (Ch) (11 January 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Thomas Brown Estates Ltd v Hunters Partners Ltd [2012] EWHC 30 (QB) (17 January 2012) Legal Services Commission… [read post]
20 May 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Brittany Hunter for the Pacific Legal Foundation on the Downton Abby law. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804)  that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
It has been forcefully argued that the decision of the Court of Appeal is inconsistent with the decision of the House of Lords in Jameel v Wall Street Journal ([2007] 1 AC 359).  [read post]