Search for: "Hurst v. Hall" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2014, 1:59 pm by Kent Scheidegger
I am still working on a comment on the substantive aspects of today's Supreme Court decision in Hall v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 3:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“[A]n attorney-client relationship does not depend on the existence of a formal retainer agreement” (Moran v Hurst, 32 AD3d 909, 911). [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 6:38 am by Lyle Denniston
  That is the issue the Court granted in Hall v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 7:06 am
  The new rule announced in Hurst v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
The decision of Mr Justice Jay in Soriano v Forensic News LLC  [2021] EWHC 56 (QB) is interesting in a number of respects but in particular for its analysis of the circumstances in which the GDPR will apply to a publisher (or indeed any data controller/processor) based outside of the EU. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Damages Dan Tench explained how the remedies available to individuals asserting data protection rights have been widened by the landmark ruling in Google v Vidal-Hall [2015] EWCA Civ 311, as s 13(2) of the DPA has now been disapplied and individuals are entitled to recover damages under the Act for non-material loss. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 11:27 am by Ellena Erskine
Florida’s law on non-unanimous juries was partially struck down by the Supreme Court in Hurst v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:57 am by INFORRM
  For example, in Quinton v Peirce & Cooper ([2009] EWHC 912 (QB)), where a DPA claim was added to libel and malicious falsehood claims, Eady J said: “I must now turn to the Data Protection Act. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:33 am by Mark S. Humphreys
A 1987, case from the Dallas Court of Appeals styled, Texas General Indemnity Company v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 3:10 am
Hall) became official yesterday, by vote of the university's regents. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The new director general of the BBC, Tony Hall, will begin work on 2 April 2013, it has been reported. [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:04 pm by Kate Howard
Texas 15-797Issue: (1) Whether it violates the Eighth Amendment and this Court’s decisions in Hall v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:38 am by INFORRM
There were a handful of resolved cases reported:  Full Fact v The Sun, Clause 1, 06/05/2013; Mr David Murray v Sutton Guardian, Clause 1, 03/05/2013; A woman v The Sun on Sunday, Clause 9, 03/05/2013; and Dr Carol Uren v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 03/05/2013. [read post]