Search for: "Hurt v. USA" Results 21 - 40 of 191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2021, 3:26 am by Chukwuma Okoli
”[5]   Comments There are five comments that could be made about the Court of Appeal’s decision (Hussaini JCA) in A.B.U. v VTLS.[6] First, the Court of Appeal (Hussaini JCA) in A.B.U. v VTLS[7] followed Oputa JSC’s obiter dictum in Sonnar (Nig) Ltd v Partenreedri MS Norwind.[8] It should be stressed that Oputa JSC’s obiter dictum is not binding on lower courts according to the Nigerian common law doctrine of stare decisis. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 8:27 am by Eric Goldman
Such statements hurt the court’s credibility and abuse the privilege afforded Supreme Court justices. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 7:21 am by Amy Howe
On Tuesday, the justices will hear oral argument in a pair of cases, Nestlé USA v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 2:28 pm
Thus just as they flouted Resolution 1.10 from the 1998 Lambeth Conference in 2003, when they approved the consecration of Bishop V. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:33 pm
In an ideal world, safety issues would be detected before anyone were to get hurt. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:33 pm
In an ideal world, safety issues would be detected before anyone were to get hurt. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:53 am
As reported previously on this weblog, in 2012 the World Trade Organization (WTO) Appellate Body decided in favour of Mexico in the long-standing Mexico v USA dolphin-safe labelling dispute. [read post]