Search for: "Hutchison v. Hutchison" Results 1 - 20 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2011, 3:41 am by traceydennis
British Telecommunications plc v Office of Communications (Hutchison 3G UK Ltd intervening) [2011] EWCA Civ 245; [2011] WLR (D) 83 “On its true interpretation section 192(6)(a) of the Communications Act 2003 did not impose a statutory bar on the introduction of fresh evidence on an appeal to the Competition Appeal Tribunal. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 1:44 am
Hutchison 3G UK Ltd v Office of Communications (British Telecommunications plc and another intervening) [2009] EWCA Civ 683; [2009] WLR (D) 245 “Where the relevant regulator was considering whether a mobile telecommunications company had ’significant market power’ under the governing statutory regime the dispute resolution powers of the regulator were properly to be disregarded. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 9:08 pm by Lawrence Solum
The paper concludes with an illustration of this method in SOCAN v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 2:06 am
Licence auction not in VAT system Hutchison 3G UK Ltd and Others v Commissioners of Revenue and Customs Case C-369/04 Court of Justice of the European Communities “The public auction by a government agency of third-generation universal mobile telecommunications system licences was not an economic activity and therefore did not come within the value-added tax system. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 10:30 pm
If a child has greater need than the others, a parent may have good reason to leave a larger share to that child.A recent case, Hutchison v. [read post]
5 Nov 2006, 9:28 pm
The recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in the matter of Hutchison v. [read post]
5 Nov 2006, 9:28 pm
The recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in the matter of Hutchison v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 5:10 am
Hutchison v Hutchison, Docket No. 284259 [Muskegon County, July 28, 2009] The trial court held that the prenup could be voided because the facts and circumstances are so changed since the agreement was executed that its enforcement would be unfair and unconscionable, citing Reed v Reed, 265 Mich App 131, 142-143 (2005). [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
On Nov. 8, the Nevada Supreme Court denied a Petition for Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition in Health Plan of Nevada v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 12:35 pm by PaulKostro
Law Lessons from JOHN HUTCHISON V. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 3:45 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Hutchison 3G UK Ltd v The Office of Communications [2009] EWCA Civ 683 (16 July 2009) Slade v Slade [2009] EWCA Civ 748 (17 July 2009) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) CPS (Sussex) v Mattu [2009] EWCA Crim 1483 (17 July 2009) High Court (Administrative Court) Manhire, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of [...] [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 5:36 pm
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Gomez & Ors v Vives [2008] EWCA Civ 1065 (03 October 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Hutchison & Ors v B & DF Ltd [2008] EWHC 2286 (Ch) (03 October 2008) High Court (Commercial Court) Dallah Real Estate & Tourism Holding Company v Ministry of Religious Affairs, Government of Pakistan [2008] EWHC 1901 (Comm) (01 August 2008) Mediterranean Salvage & Towage Ltd v Seamar Trading… [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 8:03 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - Alexis Hutchison ("Hutchison") (pictured right) appealed a small claims court ("trial court") judgment in favor of Trilogy Health Services, LLC, d/b/a Springhurst Health Campus ("Springhurst"), on Springhurst's claim against Hutchison and her now-deceased mother, Martha Farber ("Farber"), for payment of services provided to Farber while she was a resident at Springhurst. [read post]