Search for: "Hyman v. First Provident Corporation of South Carolina" Results 1 - 1 of 1
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Belmora doesn't replace 43(a)'s usual requirement of protectable subject matter in standard trade dress case
27 Feb 2019, 1:58 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Hymans initially displayed SOTI restroom samples in its Charleston, South Carolina restaurant and sold SOTI salt scrubs in its attached gift shop. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/